tnaie coua at Ui»n uuic uui£. oase parujr ucaiu.A TRUAJfT BARBER.Theresa Vogbt vs. Louis Voght. Gross neglect and willtul absence wete charged. The parties were married at Lancaster. Ohio, November 21, 1854 A son of the plain riff, aged sixteen years, testified that in December. 1867, his father, -who was a bgrber by trade, left his family, and they never heard of him since, although his wife advertised for him. At the time be left they were living in Danville, Illinois. He went away twice before, but returned.A decree was granted on the ground of willful absence. J. B. Oolikim for plaintiff.Catherine Cridland vs. C. E. Cridland. A suit for divorce on the ground of willful absence. It appeared the parties had separated, but the Court said the testimony did not show by whose fault the separation took place.Farther evidence to be hoard.