KfcBMPIAU'S answer.'..--Hi* Wife's Actions Were Brought oa by Deaigniog, Persons. ****** to the petition inS. Krompkau la eu* bg-W. B.) Krempkau for divorce, M -fan filed in the- Thtrty-sov-'fith ^etrlct court.»answer denies tlio ailega. ^|,0«8 of the petition that ho has ipgS* mistreated pJaiutitf and as-;:^ris:the facts to be that ho has her with uufforra kindness ; forbearance and has always discharged tho duties of a true, ^..loyai itnd devoted husband; that ^■•.the necessity of confining her in a ■5|jt?»ai.ic asylum is as painful to him •j?s it could bo to her or any one-^'elee.®erfinlt;lanf denies tho allegations |{k8 tb the value and rental ol his ;vjfroperfcy, which, lie says, ho ac-^q^lrod before his marriage atid in-'•rnorlted from hie mother’s estate. !H0 says tho homestead on West T (Houston street la valued at $2,500 -iaiid that the amount of tho com* I .munity estate is valued at $1,625.'i ’Defendant says that he is providing for tala wife and will hail :y?ikfa joy her recovery from the ^mental derangements from yw^hioh she Is euflorlng. Ho fur-fr fchfcr eays that ho does not believe * liifl wife is doeirouH of a d I vorco, but ithat wicked and designing persons have.taken clvantage of her \^ weakened and disordered intellect ■to bow tho seeds ol family discord and induced her to take Hits stop, .which, in her nano moments, eke Will deeply deploro, and if ever ro stored to complete rationality will entirely repudiate.Defendant prays (hat the suit be dismissed.