Hide Article Text (OCR)
eported.a drink-he was Murray /ith top tag two e passed and feltllm.zv and ho were tal am-VANESmericancurren-rospectsc terms ■ of 1.70 of 63.74ned to he prepointsti guild-German its; and points, e to 37quotedprevious;d one Ameri-3n con-yester-sterling.iYS'FINEailfcy to s, Ray 53 Linas finedLardinTest byd Alvinof the he slips d aboutre con-to thein a £ Storm ig him sd hcr-.irty, of Middle-agatnstGO / OTHESompson,becamee nudist oned inue «mm s, Irene ft withme took *****French franc, at below 65 cents.JURY OFFIVEFINDS VERDICTFOR MRS. CROSSContinued from Page OneMr. Buttenheim it endangered the “time honored custom” of hiring and firing servants. Yesterday Mrs. Cross sat on a spectator's bench throughout the trial.Left To The Jury• threwMaurice Travers, counsel for Mrs. Newhall, got his first surprise yesterday when at the conclusion of his client’s .story, the defense attorneys announced: No cross examination.” But he got a greater surprise when at the completion of his case, the rival attorneys immediately announced: The defense also rests.”Shorn was the complainant of. the opportunity to bolster her case by cross examination of defense witnesses. Lost was the opportunity to hammer home to the jury evidence that often is gained in rebuttal witnesses.To form his legal proof in the direct testimony, Mr. Travers had been forced to call, as his only witness besides Mrs. Newhall, William E. Cross, Clemson Saw company official and husband of the defendant, in order to identify a letter which Mrs. Newhall had written to the Crosses after her discharge.No Cause for Action But this sally into the enemy’s camp failed to produce the saliently needed proof that Mrs. Newhall had attempted to find other employment after her release from the Cross household, and City Judge Howard M. Starr ruled that even though the jury might decide that a verbal contract had existed Mrs. Newhall could recover only “nominal damages.” He left It to the jury to determine what constituted nominal damages.”And the jury returned with a verdict of no damages at all.The jurors were William E. TU-ford. Jacob C. Foser. Fred S. McWilliams, Frederick N. Cudney and Arthur A- Brown.The comedy event of the trial was the effort to find a sixth juror, which caused high consternation for William R. Rowley.' He had been drawn but excused‘and then while walking along the street later found himself apprehended by police who unknowing of hi* earlier exeoae and not understanding hi* protests t low brought him in for a second appearance. Again be wu refeaeed. Meanwhile Charles Faulkner, city marshal, who bad been font on an «ti» i—odtng hgwt for more farms, showed up with a pair of pros-pacta in tow. Both, however, ware tftoqtsaUM.The Osage xrcalled by theMore than Pennsylvanij line yesterde cars in an op vania side c Voorhis, W.-over the ltalt; join the sti much of Pen: ductlon.lt; State po sent them b; the motor ca the line, it wPOLICEPITTSBU1state, troope: Coke Compe.vented a cl deputies and man was befSKATEREdgar Wa street, who North street by the tradeAlbert W. Ntsuffered onl; knee and rii police report.PROTIALBANY • tag that the nues derived solely for hii ing prepared automobile Bates, secret than $36,000, other uses.BARGE A!BUFFALO Coast Guarc this mominc bell was mi twelve miles barge was r a crew of fc of mollasses.INDIAN 1MILWAUI Blue Eaglegiven to a i and Mrs. Fr: is part India the parents titled to the name.THOMPSTHOMPSC well church ’ per at the cl Mrs. Duncar at a bridge p and Mrs. I daughter areCineinnatus,Richardson i Monday forfield,MAT I BUFFAI held In jnll by Buffalo ion band* o(bare been kin the burboi jrttbpotuu
Newspaper Details
Middletown Times Herald
Middletown, New York, US
Thu, Sep 21, 1933
Page 16
Full Page
Clipped by
Bismarck V.
ND, USA 12 Apr 2020
Other Publications Near Middletown, New York
Middletown Times Press
Middletown Times Herald
Middletown Daily Times
Middletown Daily Press
Middletown Daily Herald
