This morning the suit of Martha I. Oakman vs. James Statler was heard. This is a suit in which the plaintiff alleges that the defendant purchased fraudulently some corn of Robert Cox which he knew by rights belonged to the plaintiff. It seems that Cox rented Mrs. Oak* man’s farm, near Good Hope, and was to pay $700 rent, $350 in Sep* tember and $350 in January. Ho paid $150 in September and $200 a short time later. In January he paid $75 and she afterwards levied on a little corn that was left and got about $16 more, which was all sho got on the rent. Cox sold 2,000 bushels of corn to Statler and the plaintiff alleges that Statler purchased the corn knowing there was a lien on it, as the law gives the