Hide Article Text (OCR)
MIAMI, ARIZ., TUESDAY EVENING, OCT. 30, 1928iott!In the trial of Mrs. Lucy Nash Bach- man to haul school children during the ,\\man, county superintendent of schools, year in dispute, for which he w^s paid *.|vhunrwl with embewlemont, thlt; state *1HO- Arson's testimony was directed |*. , „ toward an attempt to impeach that ofclosed its case in the superior court of %f ,,ltl %l ..Mrs. fiihhs. Mr. Hammocks was alsoOilu county yesterday afternoon, the ,n ,.„n,rmll(.t 1(in nf Mrslt; «;i,lhs- t,.sti.last witness helm: C. H. V. Hind, cash ‘monj.CfP—PIWWii: VThe deposition of Wescott. to ier of the Old Dominion bank who told taken at Klamath Falls, Oivg., told lt;p of the warrant in controversy for that the county superintendent andi$5(15.80, having: been cleared through each of her deputies purchased goods irlt;his hank. Mrs. Wick, deputy countyfrom the Woolworth store, sometimestreasurer, testified to the warrant in paying: in oash and sometime* hy the question having gone through the personal check of Mrs. Bachman. He treasurer’s office. states! that such dealings for schooldilt;*1aI 5* ^ V] bV ^ w • ; ‘ •• r‘; *r *L ^ c..Charles Hawllhs, attorney for de- supplied amounted to several hundred fendant, made a brief oieuing state- dollars during the |ieriod in dispute.hnment in which he said that all of the Both Mr. McMillen and Mrs. Baeh-if, money, which the warrant in dispute man testified that the amounts paid y representvd, hail been expended for to Merrinmn, Sebastian and the Wool- t] school purposes by the defendant in worth ro., totalvd the amount of the j, tin* course of business in the admlnis- warrant in dispute, $505.80.I It is the claim of the defendant that Witnesses introduced by defendant the warrant was supiorted by receipts p, up to noon today, were T. J. Merrignn, from the different parties named, ti Miami contractor, Joe W. Stebastian which were attached to tbb demand ast rat ion of the office.s:stage dVIver, K. lt;». Peterson, B. I-. Ham- vouchers and which are not now in p!molt;k, Karl H. McMillen, Merle It. Wes- evidence. There are other minor is-sncott and Mrs. Bachman. Mr. Mvrrigan sues covered hy the evhhmce and the} ytestified that he did certain repair case is being hoti contested on everywork on school furniture, for which he point. While this ilt; taking consider- \\■. f 'yV.*\ jy 4-1 ' * •lt; -* S'^. . ’/j1 Mr* • *• %V ^ril . A* • -rV * *was jmitl $75 in cash at one time, and able time, it is believed the argumentother amounts at other times. Sebas-[may commence this afternoon or toitlan’s testimony was to the effect that morrow morning, ami the ca*e con-he had bt*en employed hy Mrs. Bach- eluded tomorrow.
Newspaper Details
Arizona Silver Belt
Miami, Arizona, US
Tue, Oct 30, 1928
Page 5
Full Page
Clipped by
Tara D.
CA, USA 13 Aug 2019
Other Publications Near Miami, Arizona
Miami Arizona Record
Miami Arizona Silver Belt
Miami Daily Silver Belt
Miami Daily Arizona Silver Belt
Arizona Silver Belt
