whatever may be in theirTRIALon a giif I mplentythe right of search. With the warrant present Attorney Southard charged that the paper W^ifegmllg drawn,and that the dead Sheriff had been the affiant, and couid not legally aerve hU own warrant. He further objected onread **on a reliable source of inform*- «**tion” liquor was in the Loroan home, vanoesff k*’ end contended that the name of the in- t* divir seeing ormant should be in the warrant as althouj Ing it required by law. Attorney Southard hlt; !nit«d Clted ihe cuee of Dupree oi Darlington ((to uphold hw position. Attorney Julian I hJ r un“ a. Sall«*y ior the state argued that tackier 1 law #v#n jjf the warrant was defective it on the ichool showed the intention of the officers on comlt;,„.n the, a peaceful mmsiotv and that thy were,icy not trespassers. He asked that the «? paper be admitted as evidence. Judge f thnt pr°* i,«nham announced that he would re- the tacrtaina (jess court until 2 o'clock, so that he startsmight thoroughly weigh the matter ^ €ounhampered by the confusion at a ,. curt room, and recess was then inxm '**** pria- wo hours shead of the general time, other (da in Admitted in Eridence. ——jmovcm’Amhk At the c nvemng of court that af- runnimi) dol~ [ ten*®'. ’i J (it'# Lanham announced his ^m^rkt, admit the ««««t » evi-