4 font I mil'll From 1 :**1for law eniorrr-%dering flit* city manager to earn ing lie could see no reason foron ;t (-outinuous campaign again-’ complaint, lhat gambling exists in..... , , other cities. Ro*sendahl also re-gambling and vice, vv ilson replied:* •of the motion• *meriti ' tI Hpolicedepartment[ sent a copy i to Chief Bippus.“Did vou see that he carriedi; out those instruction.'' ?*’ Wittmaiasked. Wittman then advised WAD 'on he could do what he (Witt-f hat tin- r • \ manager .-mmM beg iinan) had done—walk into placesand see for himself what is goingv iewed some of the history of past politics, going hack as far as fourWilliam Bcckcit sun:“I I -*■» i-it \ i■ v s range to meft fOIUMnI MULO 111fict* and tell him how to runcitv. It seems strange thatof -1! he on.citv JuanU;fe should disclaim1 he ire- isoonsibilit v• ♦! o*' jaw enforcement and pa- ii on I ) Inc police chic!.Asks Him Every DayDrank Ror-endahl came to Wilson's defense with the remark ! hat it is impossible to stop all gambling and that “vou rantvea rs.» ■Me told Wilt man he (Rosen-dahl) wouldn't have entered thealleged handbook establishment.“You might have got stabbed, or something,*' Rosendahl said.Competency QuestionWilliam Beckett interspersed with the remark that much of thediscussion was irrelevant — that the question wn- “is the cityec11SI1*(: a i(I Itilt;blame I In* eit-v nuitinfor putlnnnairrr competent to enforee tinillf i;\N il - on jvplicd 1 ha' ! lt;1 iij,0 ting* his iru-i in the eh it f of peon1)0lice ('l)KCV(1 Vif 1e haslit• **ereceived any complaints on gambling.Witt tnnpoll ! ii?'ce“L ione oigamb]- reply to theeelt;1 * • - . lt;r.si hosefrom oh j)oolvci.\ culmle. trt• 4aaid.Wilsonhadked W ittmahimnot\\). ouirn ! x 11 a ntheTo 111is Wittman repliedWilson always knew when gam* •n;lis toihliug establishments were runningjwhen he, Wilson, wars a countman.Wilson’s answer was an infer-j\y core that it was strange Wittmanj would bring up the issue of gambling in council because Wittman J,5 poker.i otia v,state laws.Rosomiah] was the only council });(. Ir)l member to speak on Wilson’s be-,1ml!. lie praised Wilson’s admin- onistration. Edward Beckett, Vince ,jf Emminger and Andrew Brack,w:i• i, with Ro endaiii, voted W’il-into office, remained silent.seventhCO:1)0*111-P11onMiCO.whx hJO I 1 iV0 lt;Jpin;said he trtedst*« Iiim Wcdnosdav aUernoon,«in formed bv Wilson's secre-Witt manImtv a lt;tarv4in co W 1then asked the cit\ manager if he intended to raid iiis home.st rhi!that\ 1JLtI ox1iho citv Tnaiiimor was••Pp co.Witt man*»When personsmaktitash*dat i lt;us in had lakonWilsonto carryIVIout a motion•eutc-d several weeks agowhich c as adopted by council or-hling their livelihood nitely against state laws, Witt- Kman said in drawing the distine-!I sonlt; ioorl£0 Ra dcliffe, her, was absent.Prior to adjournment, Wittman introduced a motion that the city manager report to council at itsnext caucus the steps he intends to take to carry out council’s ac-;j. * *tiiu of several weeks ago order- I clri i- dcfi- 'nT a eontiiiuous campaign against j ofambling.Wittman termed gambling as ast r!.'itgames in mo-t -erious issue and stated “l‘strhomes and commercialized gam-|wa^ no! kidding when I made that(Wiltman) prc-D“n between pokerbling In pri sons who make 1 hat ■ motion to campign against gambl-1 * • •then* business. . . Commercialized 11!T-gambling*j'on sbiggestThe motion requiring the report; f roni the citv manager was de-VACUUM CIEAKERSI; problem.William Ih'ckctt then reminded!icated by a -I to ‘J vote. Kosendahl.USED(LOSE 011HOOVER SIMD* RPREMIERU YA. IN ABEE-N \C\ 1,1. ( I.EWERS El \RANTEE1)Singer Co, (12 High St,PHONE 2-0437council that Wilson, when he tooki Bruck, Emminger and Edwardprlt;emanfluCOSoffice, claimed lu* could do th* job.Can’t Police CityWow he says he can’t police the city even though he said lie subscribed to council's policy of law enforcement, Beckett said.Wilson came forward with thestatement that “the price of aliberal Hamilton is Hack W ilson -neck,” then said “maybe Mr. j Rosendahl should take over.*’ Rosendahl “took over” bv, Beckett voted against the motion.Wittman and William Beekettvoted for the motion.SEEK DAMAGES AGAINST RAPPS ON RENTAL CHARGETwo petitions were tiled in common pleas court against Chari*st reet.Sti533 Walnut | dalleging that rentaland Kay Rapps,exn ■ ‘ * nlt;*hnrut‘d in exoe^.sof the lt;)fl ieoiprisi v-of Price Administration (O.P.A.)poiscln**lule.*s t a