turnI iillil• llOllVliiO lt;II k* W Si .,1.he was pi. nv heed slt;» such in’iiinutiieat ions.Not Proper ConductAt this William Beckett ufought to re ml «■*•ttncr:I that npudence on tin* p. i t of a city man nger is not proper conduct and that a city manager *houid not an- see «;i'a councilman i. n-i uni- wsthiie WWi ions or ti cut mannei.\S ittii.an took the t loor again. A.11e doH,.red I h,«f w !n tlo r tin* let ■ *ter hlt;* ref erred to had been signed lit ft or not hud no hearing on the mat *ilt; ter, the•*Vou iiif oimeil me then. never-1 diesf In h »K, t It M t lie plaee W (i,* DOt a-tip* at nr',' NN'ttman res'irut* I re aA iepoi * i om ( hid*! itippuh hanthat d,'. ; to the **f 1«* t the ity,A#pi mi w a* ? i * * I *!j WjNoii allot»• nmt n pt*1 ii I? ot t id-t i, i in t ht « i! \ 1111m* vit \ itiiti Wittiiiunthat lit* i^iouUi )*ni|M ah\ t*om-I ■ 1 1h : ^ * * wouldIm* tliktjl « a 11 m*\ 11 * 4 \\ 11 mi? a \ i« in pi #■lt;i fo paM ottttuued Dm