. PlatSchwa rtzehgraber Will Case Ic j Now in' Progress'*— Witnesses 210! to Will Testify thft They Saw ^Late Henry B, . Schwartzeiy-graber Sign Will-—- Jury not l MaiI to Give Verdtctj in'Ca6tUntil A| Monday., , lt;Jfy. ——• - Mat; jjj • v -A suit,which involyes the estate of Sta'I he late Henry B. h wa r tx en g'r a be r Kin of this city, is being heal'd in the Allen county common pleas court, Ilea the . case having’ opened Friday. 1.Eight persons are named as plain- Ma tiffs in the ease, 'They ate William I and Calvin E. Bardes, Emily 01- CaiII Flaherty, Adeline Wyrtrt, Anna Dalk, Lin ; Lulu Lindemann and'Louise «nd Ma- £i fhias Doepker, They alleged that the pt Ipurported will of thlt;| §» Mr. Sehwart- £ zengraiber, narnihg his widow, Mrs. let ; Lilian SehwartzengTbbv, a£ sole ben- 3 . eficiaiy, was not drawn by Mr. Est Schwa rtzen graber, LinThree Lima bankers, Harvey Ro- 1berts, formerly of this city, Joseph A. 362 Krabach and J. Clem Thompson, testified that the signature attached to the will was not that of the late Mr. T\ i i Sehwartzengraber, Two writing' ex-I perts of Cincinnatijalsj testifielt;l to i this effect.Mrs. Sehwarizengrabev claimed0 that the signature:lt;w»s that of her husband and that the will was found1 among her husband's, papers several- months after his death. Eku The value of the estate involved ^a-in the suit is placed at $48,327.50. ref' ADD SchwartzengTftber ....... 1,0One writing- expert, Julius Bar- wa Q nett, Lima, testified.-; Saturday tor rel i he defense, his testimony being — o that the signature on the document i- was genuine. • ■yj Two witnesses to the will, Parker. I y j (Irove, of C.eveland/'brother of Mrs. I •e Schwartzengraber,ap tt. Cl eorge Heis- ] I ing, were called to the stand and tes-'jB,n tided that they saw Mr. Sc-hwartzeti-. I graber sign the will and that they. I also saw each other, sign it. IAt 4:00 o’clock Saturday after- I noon, the attorneys were ' making I their pleas. The court was expected jl to deliver his charge to the juryjB SatUitlay afternoopiter lt;vhich, it Blt;; V'.uw mm H Bdismissed until Monday ..when they fl would return to court and commence- B their deliberations, B