in T4TOX. or;: tum *x+ixiir*:Ttkm Ootrl D««MW lbi«; mmt IUN)iiaf'! WM lWfe|#d:|»o vMt|Refer*©; WIIIIam ■ B. \ AuAtqw9 hwailiAawuS 4liis tioebion in.’* catte yi»t«rlt;toy. Mr*. Jinui© JA...(Wlt;t dc©*ued Augualin© J. 'Cole »ni|;Ret«i:F,.Qriily3iilt;New Ycwk ocwtuin*M; for *3,000,.coefcumoa..: fonabheil to her forthe ■how^j^©^:-defeodantji were no« made according to cdntrwil;^' xml were in fact so .tthmmelewly, scant uWifc©opera.was a flat failure because- decent. p«opliV-would noL.’fo to see.it. 8, H;, WmnileH and^.l. Harrison Hoyt appeared for the pialntiiK The ’* text of the d«obiou i#:1 And a* matter* or fact: . . • .. ... v• or about the lDtb day of SAptWraboiv'-lSfcj, the aeiemianw were and. ©ver-»ia«© tavi-v* bueu co-part nerd enaragyd In busin©#© in lb© city. ’.1 fi2i ?, blLi a t»ou t Sftld lOihday of Sep tom ber;! • the dotundauu as ■uulj eo-i«rintira**i a inr attEU, ton to red into a certain, contract with, the'-: .. plaintllT herein, . whurBtrf . and. whereby ,thuv--r pro inis uu undmgrced to manufactory and deliver^--plain till' a act of thcHLrUj;i£ ooaiumtts.to b«:2?™, ?y he,r Patenting the opera of r ‘-mo v: ‘“eaoty^ and* luai; la. co»*Mcrail©u/ thoicur this pialDtlir promised uad agreed to.mv :. to tju imiiJI aefendania the- tutu of #»(*) on the do-:-', uvoiy of tho said costume©, and the turn oj *300 Jri ’•V*}' ^ S? weekly aitor auch.do! I Yerv: ' -a. Lhauat tfco-lime.or the maielna of#ucb.c*ii-• tract the pita iiir romm un icatod. with 1 h© do- '’I that be deiigned' to umj'iimk''.iS k COt*lUu**wL *£*■’ eh^ pai-pofiw or. preaoatiB*'l'r ibUyo opera, and that sho iutijudtjij loenaair© T»©r-^' purine re to render the sumo ana ilmt sholnujndtod.V. to present fbeaamo in thy city, of Sri’aoaiu and at ; Yju-ioua other places, . .. .. J . ■4. That tho'deiyiidunti.’ fce auch co-mrt with rail knowJetl^ofthe'purpeso and objector ?m!*P ?iUt% 1 ** ft|ore*5*a. wlUt.LhoinlAla-.-V- JL y«i lwnua ot HKld to manufactureth* eald coatuiBcjj,. and war ran tod’that tho van iov ' 'should be muou facturad in a proper and ©u liable--' wanner for the rendition or ouera. ©mltlmi?''’ thy name should t© all in ado of the beat materials-'- • -and.that the principal ooatumea ■houldbe made': •Uaat all oi the wiia.ooatutnoii^:* should be complete and ready for uae-opoiL their-' • deLlveryr that tit© same should be rande accord-'V lug to designs and'atyie#Sbocldtd’Ov•deiend*C«tji- -LIU in * pood: durable and work manlike. tOHiiirner; and that Lhey-furthor-jircwtlaed. and %aret*Xi-: \ that they should i© delivered:, to. Iba plaintiff:*t':i ' hj-raouae on October g, 1885, aoihat.ctopUliuiiri. -could nao the asm© la- *©■»erai ' drcas- rekwranW. ■ bcjore the dale fixed for the preaantatlon of. aiid, J' opera before Uo public. ••. • .. 5. Tlurt'the plaintiff peiato-th© da dan la-the-*.‘ sum or}M0 before the costume* war*deilvered.to; her; and fully ^rformed oa; her. part all.ab*-w*a- :' rerjulred to do before the d*ilT©ry ol in« mM co*-ttiujes to her by tho-defendants, •• •••••G. That the defend an w-i-atled-to per form theVr-- 1ooeitract with the plaiauiT, in that they aid noiM delivor said coetumea to her at lb© time:when;: \ they were repaired to do so by the term*of mMi i' ** cfjiitract, but deliTered thy aaldcoaiaufes to her ' --on the, ^ening:^ of Sunday, October-lij-iwv-.m bcfore Ui© time fixed for the first preaeota. • lion of said opera. •; . ;, _T T ;?; That the said cost ureea-wer* dellvoiwd.to thn^-plaintiff at Syracuse. That tho sald'dellvery. wu: mode by the-defendant .Orady tn- person.- I'fuLt*-' -snorr.ly it I tor too -box conutinlnr aaltl coetame*U wiw a-pe n©d, a-nd'-beioni aJ 1 of a*id cosiume* we™- 1 aellverud.to the plain11 if, complaint whs made br f* berdo said Grady that the1 coatuwea; were-: not-such fta had he«n ordered and tfrmc tLll.+i; 'iso*J- -U1UI88 COled lor by- said eoniract. wore not. nr«a-w‘: ?nl‘ Gralt;y admitted aucbt b© tb«;-’fact: Tlmt said ©ofltucn*«,w lib aome. alt ©rat io»slt;:' ' and ropaira, wsro nsud In the prosunxmUqii of ih©:;'.. opera, or vTb© diceping ileauty*1 by tke plain ttff ' ' ana were reialaod by. her. - •' .v.--.—~T •B; That thedoiendanra- dinnot'*perform - tbetr'' contract with the plaint Iff- In that iber did; not’- ‘ jimnu'aotnrc said coaiumes of tho-matcriaJa-.ro--- :-QLilrca by the lerma of K-ld comract, but th-it tb©v; e.im© were made of materials of a fat* Inferior Li. grade And quality.... That -the fafd defendants did! K;-«ot in tiko buch cost a mee In tbe manner atidaiyJo- ■ required bv.the terras of said, cootraot: nor IttMir-proper and *nliK03e umntj-er tor thepreaentlijsc of1 an opera before th© public, Thai Lh©-aakl cos-V-;‘ lu mes were [unchaste Jn tiiclr style and. drafKii- ■■Hi at inftijy ©f ih© saidi ciwtumes wore mad© in' uity-uusklifn., iHigNgeTitttud Improper manner;-and '/ . Unto many ihureof.wera baetcdaud no-t.»©wn to- ; -Suihtrr, uiid ^oiild not b©worn by th© performers •-or. whom they weroimule without rip pi an upart.'' by reaaon ofUucU. biiatina;ana ihaL So ©very, way •the sttUI eoHUiimu, were toferlor. tu. slyie. rnato-ii:il and w©r*:iiirta*fciip to which c1clCKdH.niH . .had iitirreeis an lI.promised to'litrnlah toplAinttir.0. ihftt'iv nuuiiMir of anfd costume* did' not fit Lh^ persons- for whom rhaY were designed.■10 Thatii nnmiK'i* of the coatutiios- which dc---icuuant bad promised and ugrtttd.to iunilah- the. plainliJT wore, wholly lack lag aud woru iHivor de-llvorefl to her. unci ihiLtpaiu© «( other costlunofi '• wblch they h- d proirilaed ttufi- xgrwd to furxiish-'' bov: were ulso lucking.. . -.;• ” v •11.TLsattUo viiiuuof a set nf oOBtumns Bueh’as -do lend ao vs hud h gm nrt and p wnn bed i u umb© and' : d©:irnr to the pJaintijT la.lbo sum or $700..- .12. Thai the value of - the st»t of -costumes ftciii-'- 'a Iv made and:del It©red py ilio doftsiidaeUB Uj the ulalniirf 1^ tho sum oTlW..- '•••-.- . ,r13. That thurels'no turtlclout OTldenofl 1 In -the- • CJLUC Showing or tcudlng u*fipw thni any fdliw, of said opom was caused lv ihft do fault of Ihe do-; roudants in'failing to porfonh ihelr couttaoL as above HpcelTiod;’ j- • . .. - - ■•14. That thr re Is no; cnfilcicnt evidence in thdi:Cstsu showing or tend log-to.4* tio-w the. amount'of. tho dur«»ge. If nayrsuffered' by the' plaintiff: by ' reason of tho nogioct of the detonilania.u* dal Ivor sal cl costumes oa th© dajiipon which such doilv-;-. ery was requlied by Uiv-iertin of said’con-. UltoL •An cob cl i i bto U3 . of lawt41 ilnd:-: •' i. That ; ih©-IMHlniiff Im entitled- lo. rocovur .*Tnln.»t ihe- de'.* :ondanta a# b«r d*miigee: herein. th© difference -., oetween. iko value of it cet of. eoBtums ©uch 'a©-thlt;i defeitdftDtx h*4 promised .and' agreed^io lur-nish her and, ih© vaJuo of th© act of coMttinjea*©--dually furnlabad to hur^ or the sutn of fMU. :■A Thdir.b© plalnijtf t* entLrldd- *o judgment in ' this notion agaluftt tho dof©nd*ul». In tho sun* of fiOO^ CoaLde© the ousts of thk© aciioa.I • •• •