A I*H VI I \\ Vs 1,41 s'r \\ li I l *(H\M It II VI I n «*.; QI'KSTION VltOSK VS TO WHOMMOM \ SIMM 5 1* III l’\ll,' •—A. Horn n Pf .Wits ill lKU«t4 of Mr*. Mary Murphy unci ln\lt; Iw lt;! * «*n Me lie of lepo«lt •‘or $700.Juttgo lioiisnn w, us confronted witha d^oidrdJy unusual qu* fh*n In law pattalninif to m certificate f 0* ; cTuesday. The cas* is entitled Mr-*.Mary i *nnmrs and Mrs I). Ha Onlio*way m Th# 0 'avlnga Ban)The facta were that Mr1 Mary Mur-t iiy, who died soma months ago, had |7uo in %hlt; trank for wbh h she to Iu ccrtlflcnte of deposit. This eerUfi cat** was held by her daughters, Mrs, Connors and Mrn Gallovva* who r • aide in (‘hlrago Mrs orn hadthe misfortune to h»ae ti tlflcate.The bank was whiling: to pay themom over, as \ rt\ I ton la made forref omit i k * * o» h, bu tquestion arose as tv whom It should he paid 1*0 Mrs. Cnnnoru ami Mrs Galloway claimed that their mother gave them th« cmttfloale and that itwas pay a IT to herself or to elth* r of them.mmm urtmimnmmm* immmmn i nmmmmn*** «««m«nm» *m % * mmm » * T* mrnmmmrn mumMis. Mali n* v, th* sd mints* rat fix ofthe estate, testified fhot the decedentto k th#cerfifhatc to Ini* da.lighters us claim**• fridI■ a!. | rof h« r *i i i. h?- 1} w {.* how n thatc r-..faof dt poah w hi* h was lost was forthe amount left In the bank. On thisslowing Juda*- loh-Mii out* red an nr-dei authoring the bank to pay themom y to Mrs. * Manors and Mrs Gallo way.