me'dental tacis, corioboiauve ot her testimony in chief |fIn the argument (or the defence. Mr Wheelock j } in ittii.utKil ai g eat leng'h that tin* evident e (ell i *hott o piovmg a felonious assault. with the intent ; dleged m the indictment It was much more proba* I e hie that he, m a lit of intoxication. had gone info the omuii bv mistake, and accidentally stumbled upon p the eh‘itlren's bed, and that tins nuMiap had been * m «gn»tied into a henion* ci line.In reply to Mr Wh •eluck, Mr Patker hriedv re-vie vied the te^i imon v. m the order it was given, laying some vress on Cameron - expre^ed v\ i-h tlt; have Mr S oper and In* wile vim! the circus that night, 3 which s owed ihat he hid p eeoticeued even at thai early In* *r in the ••veiling, hi- ultimate purpose, in the icenmplihment of which had been so happily detected hv the mtef te re nee * d Mr Fosbntv and hi*' wile.Juh T'fifhtr charged the jtnv brieilv. but on no* count of the Iwierie^ of the hour, adj«nirtied the Conri till four o* loch tn the alternoon, at which hottrthe jury i une m wuh ttie following verdict endoisedon-thc h tek of the in bcttneni*♦ rite jury find the defendant guilty in manner j and form a- set toftli in this ind eitnenl,* hI There can he no cav iling ab* ut the meaning ot j this venliet most aN^iiredv. lit- tn the power ot •he Court to sentence Cameron to the Sutf prison i for hfr ; but there is no limit to the minimum ut jpunnishim nt.