Article clipped from Las Cruces Rio Grande Republican

An Important Land Office Decision.• : . ...‘ V. :WV1')IIOn the ?*eond day of July. 18114, Boaiiio Chaves filed !.«nie*tead No. 724, for the • | j111 M J. see. 2fi, Ip. llf south raogti w*#t alleging i«eMlement.On January 4. im, Obadiah C. Stiver flled an affidavit a tucking #akl homesteadMo. 724, alleging that Mid Basil io ChaveshnJ wholly ihimhutd arid tract* tod bad jl maorad hit residence for more than sis MI3Emonth# aft?r making raid entry, nor he* said Chaves cultivated or improved the land aa is required by law. Upon thia statement of fact* thia office ordered hearing, and notice was laauil Iwuty 7. 1384, Mid hearing Lad j February 15. 1M6.The taatimony on behalf of the plaintiffgpaa to aim* Mil the Improve mania of the land te question, a * aw a } ue |,wc. 96,11tp. II, south ranges west, con#;#;* of ah small “j*c*r mada of pole*, a •mall piec# of fanee, \alua about flO to $15. and that 11_ ABasilio Chaves has not reaided upon aaidpland nor cultivated estnt. Even this tcati-111 mony ia vague and unsatisfactory. On page ' tie J. OH* napt he cannot give any ideaof value of improvement#. On page .1 be ♦snoot Mf positively that the land was cultivated. In answer to whether or not there are any household p ; good* or aign of occupancy in the cabinf*|| M mtwm 1% “I mui laubad ha tha nUn,J and on paged teaiiflas that Its don't know BI wbar# dat endac i dam Is living,page 6 witness aimiu that defendant might lived there from June to November without111IIIhi* knowing it TU mxi ft mm toiboui th# MM ct», with perhaf* a littlw morf flrmniti1• •rx'O,ftiIlit »tinfIiff tlm defendant la clear, and is effected upon crum examination. Itis ccnelu*ively shows that Bas.lio C'bivrt^ * * *' fcL. ^ qWV*.p • , ^. J* W* “ *’ ’ . y ~ . *£• y v* 9 * * * V * / * '* s ‘ . * *- “V* I \ *.*•.* * *Vvhas lived upon thia land for seven yen*. and BiNMnWI the satr.e and raised ctope ' i thereon fur tour yeart. Has two house*, one * | adobe and one store, corral fences, ea, me. That theae improvement* are located upon different pcrtiona of the land. Th* plaintiff then introduces L. J.to show the! Chaves’ irapraatpwait are n« tupon tha land in question, hut are about 70 yard* from te* line of the land described, #| j nw |, a | ne |, sec, 26, tp. 11, south rang* S «eat. Thia feet is tat clearly established* and granting that such was th* case, “when a house waa built CO yards outside the line* of bit claim, but was occupied by him in good faith, it will be regarded as a constructive rts denc* upon the land.** .;vf|, * • : • Talking ton vs. ikmpfling, 2 L. D., 46*FbytaiPM H gpns. case Copp, public land,tal. 1,1 Letter, **$.1P(.* . viriitiIliIO.icd hHk being apparent from the value of the improvements and aafcafpraeuiptcr, hia temporary absence are held to be ex-caaad by tba exegenciea of business. • •Lauven Dunlap, IL. D. 615; Underwood va.Eves, 2 L. D., 601 Danger from boatil* Indiana, is a valid ti* cusa for tempi rary abaoncowhen naidcncebaa baa* actually e.ulUabad. Tbar* ,*y.\. ‘ ; y.‘.t ■‘iNi/'iwi.jIB 4 :i! ,** •• ••'•( M .*• •* lt;* * ■ * ••• . •, !* s ,.y.j 1 ? .’.*•to show ;he want of good faith on the part of Chares, while the flimsy evidence[ aflhrad by the plaintiff in support of bis} c aim. which is based sulely upon a poMible error in Chaws’ buiidinca, being 70 yarJsl tufl of laud described in bis homestead entry# give# it the appearance of k» attempt tlt;. defeat the right of a b r, a fid# settlar upun a mere technicality, Tins elate of litigation pipb*dfflfouraged. Tb* (omest is there-, at d Chares’ antry sustained. L ■musd G. Shields, Register, I fc
Newspaper Details

Las Cruces Rio Grande Republican

Las Cruces, New Mexico, US

Sat, Jul 03, 1886

Page 2

Full Page
Clipped by
Profile Icon
Anonymous

USA 22 Apr 2020

Other Publications Near Las Cruces, New Mexico

Las Cruces Daily News

Rio Grande Republican

Thirty Four

Rio Grande Farmer

Mesilla Valley Democrat