Article clipped from Dublin Journal

Save Clipping View Newspaper
inr: dijihjIn journal|.l M IIn'ymni»r,Thr l.xrd I »«.* .(. )•) ai.iI Burton.I in- following Imsrn fn«H n sperml jury | il*i* i-.nisi’iil «•!' IkmIi iuuiii ', l.nving lie.-n sworn-um Itulxri I tall. Hi.hawl l.iitnn.\t llliiO.i Spurr-.w .1.11. Smith y. Tln.n.us lt;»xi.-y.• Miirp Kiit.ili.i.i, v l .hiiim I on I i.ili ilu .M'.ndnme lt;l rnmrilv ili;-«g,i| 31 lit llli* Case if K* entered liwt. Bill) Oej-|.|II iv*h a I nil!tin in innisei:' Iri-wlt.-TI I*. oil lilt ■luiii, 11iii fi.- 111.1hn.lv hv von.!*•forV done foi In* :! ■x-.iautinatu.h i “■» wrung from w«-re jnii into lu hand* if tin* partir* ji|T.ainsisted hyjury ( i.in. 'if wllum were u.l.ai.dilie I.ili. r ilim- liy .1 ax ul•i'1I.mil.(u11.. » illi:atl'e-n-str.i,«... irI il«i•-T). • ! male rlu. Thr Hi.il lwr «v • Mr IK mrnir mdi-nMe pr-.p«-rt•••’•Ii. ihire ilu- v;.,. in tlnt, lik.WlM itom-lv. i ii n . ,;!1 •»Sci.lv I nnsrinl Al -1 - H five i-lis-f ......pirn, nisi y jury in o..lllgrille.il, Wild111* W*!-h:p hull I -VI'' It-il.Hi.i-.Ol.y V.i.uM .herr I *rr.•In. H.hi.t.Iiv, ll.-nrv, iii'l n.ii-U. is.,• in-.* agreed i.» iii.K-l.iir. who ii'xum n in \\ -dm-wUy morning I In- conn durum i|.«- ls*l l.mr -lav*.—1 Kur lt;in iin 1*1111- mil .if »1»* r» Jri of i-hali-iuih.-r . r l ot il-c |)laimiil‘ win, ihr l.-gih-W'illi-r. bile -I liauic-Kii-.x-i. ,1 I. I. nil I on r. •-..-iimiiii* lt;•■ Uuy.-'sriiiplncod..•:I».t i.i ihcsaiil Henry. .ti.-.l iiti.l l. lt Ik-1i.ii-I (inn „ wry •outing. it i* Mii.l, from two 1lluolx.ll.: 110(1 till*. 1 11.- .Ii-IVinUumof lit.- ilix r» i-I, nix! ilic iniin.r, |lainli|l ,1, i.i-, »» i.rxia-kin lo Mr Henry Walk-lt;!«ia*iil, In r share nf Haiti nro)vrly—• I|!*-1. wiiltrbl IV-.III litT Ky I lie defendant*, t tin | I.inl.lt', I hr case »-. stated hy Mr mil tor tin de(eiidiim.by Mr tic-M.t iiuiitionr.l—-Mir.- gentlemen of tin* jury. wj* n law ami tunnda.miB Bi let ii pt u. prevent. In *mllt; »u imiumiiinii. ’-hr pure adiuimxlr-ln.i. nf jus.- . i ulul it is tin refnre for you to .viiitid.-r tin- tlirrn* ol • mlit lli*t ou^Kl t*i br 1« thr *.mr. in ..ilirr n- |vrl. nil.I to the otlirm iiHrrr.(-l.i ju.y, »ui«l In*- 1n»iUhi|i, « now II hirnii-.iv In initntiw- u|a» yom inimls. th*t if1 iniiiiiiilt;l l,y what h»* apprarexl in t rt.U nrr,ilh- ju.ins, that this Wvii.tn. tin- her of I hr mi*.r. ill.- I.l.n.lifl'in ihin m»'. wife of Si-rj.-nnllicit in Intis, y.iu in*)- t)»mw ovrr-oir-i-li i-v nil finilnr innihlr whatever - whi.li Inu taken n| « mm li time ri»Ki- with a pi-rvm i-nlhtl I'onnrmi ; t»r iliil lain- |lirr in I 7m I. duringul. you f.WiHm hottnl. nlout tin . |KVlilll‘ Ii-rnn. wli U..IHlinntainvcrellof I parCJVithaif ttucli » lliarri’,!' Mr II-I.TV -•ii.xl - Mom-, i aerial l-iWalker i apt in I *-»t ati-1'IItr | 21 t» i-i.-i trivtv. i-iiiniiiiiii ul c.iiwitml the i- li-.n i mu *|.n.1--. k t-n hainr.Uy evening, the lor.l .ilol the other ju*lg*i having •i-i ih.-r i--r n»linrt time) .liargt.l the ulinli In111 the ailnplii'ilv of its *r-, .1.-1. sat ion nf tin- laxly | of ■viilrnt-t-, w.vile Ihrougli, tin- |lt;i».rfut reasnu-i .’.•ciitial point. anil its general per-Kxl tin- ii.Iii..ration of an auditory in every part. M e- i.-gr.-t that give more than a aliorl miilim-ff.ihr life-tiine of Williamson, who tlnl not .lie for ni ve»rs afterwartln, it i«. of .'.nr-r. .r even solemnly r«t-td.raUxI, «f no val-.ii wlun v.r in this rae. it lieiug in every way illegal, «m*l roiiHixun-Htly, rcvanliii- it, she must, sl'i-r.-fore. he .oiiM.IcrMl n .Ingle woman in IBOft. u-h. n her all.xlg. tl marriaife nu.k j.'are with thelate lleiirv ulker. anti father ol thr minor--New. wii.lliis lordship, a-' In this latter, •Uliongh there in no actual pr.-f olil hy any pcxvon Umt w oa present at the marriag.. yet llirrt- is alrong prestimptivt evidence on tin aultiert. It appear*, tliMitiuin mine day in IHO.',. il elere .'-mn vo up *iair* in the htnin* of Mr Henryliltthethrshivat!alit.III!forupth.it.'.ship roir-neli. had to trv »aI l.y Mating that thr.piesiion. the .n* had rn try was. wh.-llt.-r the plniiilifl, Anne ' tV'alker. ulin it up;-ars wiia 1ui.it in thr year l«nf..w»* ; fhlt;- li-:‘imale rliild nf the lute Mr lleiirv W'nlker. It , iiad. Ins ]lt;r.|ship ae.l. h.vn found tieeessary mihee.ntrs.-•if tin- h.iig pii.o-eilings and iu.jiuty that had jnvt taken plan-, to tti.ee :l.e lu*t..tv of the plaintitl'* mother for ■ .-oiiK.derahh- linn- t* foie tin iiiiiu.r was hoin, in order Ii*llv to ascertain w netln-rHie had, as had lu-en us^-rtcl*tair« in the house of M Walker, in Ha.ur-sifis-l ; that the Utter ami the plain* till’s mother wen- there tlt;»» at the sami-nmr ; that the detgintau *t«id lor twine tiiur, that alu-r in wi-nta-.y tlu- piuntitt’* mother immeduu ly auiH.uncr.1 the rir-ci.iij.unc- of her inarri..j*e to the *.-rv»nts in the hottac and those about her. and that *!»f distrihulrd amongst till'll, welding favours ; that an aei-onnt of thr marri-up.-of Mis Anne Williamson to Mr H.niy Walker was slt;?r I • Snnii‘h r/ .\ ir.y)siprr ; that thr iuacrtion of it was a! first refused, until its authrntiritv »«• vimchnl hy Mr Henry WnlWer; that Mr Henry lt;Valker did de* rfare it tlt; hecirnet. »nd the aretvnni of the marriage was th.-reuiMin insertcl ; that the ilergymsn that mar-ri.-ilthem ainmltid, hut it ha* hem proved hy hi* widow, that the plaintiff’* mother wiu intrmlur.xl to her hr her Utr husband, (the clergyman,) a* Mrs W alker, wife of Mr llcliry Walker, uf lU.m-Wrcs-c j that Mr T. Walker, the very mrsoii that left the property in dispute, rc-ognircU her a* Uio w.ht lt;»f hi* l.rother— tf.it l.c . on*nicred tHlt;- minor a* legitimate ; that the plaintiffs mother in* rireiveil hy all \lr Henry Wee* k.-r’s family, inelmling the* present defendant*, a* his wife, nn.lvniii-d hv them us such, and that the latter nmvr lt;|in-stinnrd tnelcgititnat-y of the minor until the Mr Thomas W *lker beramr an olycct of■ I.IIUhis:(tfoperly ot .omii-iiti.ni. That two retpccuhlc- witnesaea, Mr llamy l.y One■ at.dd.ni.-d hy the .uli.r, n.ntmcicl any *«•» Mr Brown j.-v.eilera, proves] that the plunlijTa ii.atrin.oiiial .-n-agom-nt* whi,h would go to invalidate mUvr fTl''»y jmrrhaaed good* from them.and that. ... 1. . . . . ......a k........ a.. Itn.,1 I lt;*. hnr thu Wtfal.......... ..... . *| her alh-gisl marriage with the minor a father. It H| me. ' p.ir.il that In-r iiiai.liu naii.e was Amu Itc-nnett ; prc-*k'’ ! vmtiH to the y« ar of Uhu, she, amotigai other places,they were wilt hmnc to Dauie-fclreet to her, a* the wife of Mr Henry Walker, ami that he paid for them a* for hi* wife. It was likewise proved that .Mr Henry Wal-Ler I'vrrptaiti! inviu*r%li it. over theorem tar* which have
Newspaper Details

Dublin Journal

Dublin, Dublin, IE

Wed, Jul 02, 1823

Page 2

Full Page
Clipped by
Profile Icon
Louis M.

IL, USA 24 Oct 2016

Other Publications Near Dublin, Dublin

Dublin Post Boy

Dublin Intelligence

Dublin Journal

Dublin Courant

Dublin Post