Hide Article Text (OCR)
lor alleged irregularity in its form.Com'th vs. William Freyburger—the defendant was charged with selling liquor to minors. Abraham Buzzard and William Marshall—minors—swore that they bought liquor from the defendant at his store in Salisbury twn., this county. The defence alleged that the indictment was laid under the law existing prior to April 8, 3SOS; that on that date the said law,was repealed, and that unless the liquor was sold before April 8th, isos, the jury must acquit, and that from the evidence it was very doubtful that the liquor was sold since that date. Nau-inan, lor defence; Dist. Attorney Brubaker, for prosecution.Com’th vs. Wm, P. Rife—indicted for false pretence—a not. pros, was entered by the District Attorney in this case for want of jurisdiction ; the proper place forits trial being in Philadelphia.The jury in the case of Com’th vs. William Freyburger, tried for selling liquor to minora without license rendered a verdictot not guilty.’ t U TTfi ill M ' -. !♦ i. i i*
Newspaper Details
Lancaster Daily Intelligencer
Lancaster, Pennsylvania, US
Wed, Jan 27, 1869
Page 3
Full Page
Clipped by
Anonymous
CO, USA 31 Aug 2023
Other Publications Near Lancaster, Pennsylvania
Lancaster Daily Intelligencer
Lancaster Father Abraham
Lancaster Examiner and Herald
Lancaster Farming
