io reconsider 11. to--: riMiilikan'.* Tribulations. oiwThe civil action of W. K. Da veil- Iport against Thomas M. Miilikan for ; jxlejectment was resumed in 'Squire alIIfeiulant demanding a jurv, and is de-feuding himself as effectively as possible. with .I.C. Dean as his attorney.hlt;nylt;oiJ. F. Morrison is counsel for theplaint ill*. ! 7At the close of the trial Miilikan Twill be arrested for forgery, W. E. ai . nDavenport having tiled an affidavit against hint to that effect. The atfi- j*davit charges him with unlawfully 1 *and feloniously forging and couuter-tlfeiting a written instrument purport-ing to be a receipt for $125.00 formoney alleged to have been paidDavenport by Miilikan.r;hfii 11Miilikan claims to have purchased Jiof Davenport the property in Docker's addition where he has lived for ithe past few months, and to have ^paid $125.00 down on it. Davenport, ewho lives near or at Sharpsville, de-elares that Miilikan talked some ofpurchasing the property at $1,300,bbut no bargain was ever made. That ^(without his knowledge or consentMiilikan moved into the house, heknowing nothing ahout his being inhSc *»|iossessioii until he came up hereahout new years to collect tin* rentfrom the family he supposed was still living in the house, lie claims thatMiilikan later paid him $24.00 in repair* as rent, that being every cent received by him. The receipt given for the $24.00 he charges Miilikan of raising to $125.00, this being theetPoi s i vi,------, r*basis of the latter”- arrest for forgery.