Coming down to the case of Hauer he said he was ra isfb d that tie bank statement was false ami that the defendant knew it was false, and that ii was issued in a corrupt manner. But the question was, whether the defend ant had sworn to it as required by law Ayers wlt; uid not say that he had Sauer said that lie had not, as also did Dyaruiau. Now Ayers seemed to be prejudiced in favor of the defeme, and Hauer certaiuly was. The court then took occasion to castigate Dyarman. He said that he did not believe that the jury believed his evidence and he was certain that lie did not himself.