in g.ABOUT A SPAN OP MOLES.k S’tcrmTTEe prosetfutioiTeritfred a~inoUou for a continuance on acconut of the absence of Mrs. Margaret Dark -md C. R Richard, son, material ; witness for The.People.^ It: - l * 4 r w j *m 4 it * i ij jtranspired upon tlie hearing of the motionthaCdefendantrwas^icjticIaliii 387ao2 was.arrested about one year ago. At.the present term the Stlt^Attorney a nol. pros., and pn)Qar€^:stooiJi|| iAdict-ment for the same offence. The court decided that if the defence would admit the statements the prosecution claimed Mr. KIofeMsoh would; teStityv C^a^i§qgcaiwould’be overruled-'^ ’ Tfie^efctimany wsadmitted, and the case taken up for trial by a jury. The testimony was heard and the jury went out at six o’clock and were instructed to seal their verdict in case they agreed.- Court then adjourned to this morning.