The firm estimated the Minister Sheik Ahmed Zaki al country’s oil shortage at up to Yamam said in WashingtonCourt reverses rape conviction of 2 menLITTLE HOCK lt;AF) -The state Supreme Court today reversed the rape conviction of two men because a )udge asked a defense witness during the trial if he had been paid to provide in formation Circuit Court Richard B Adkisson asked the question of officer Gary Stracenc»r of the Jacksonville Police Department while Stracener was testifying about attempts to locate a pickup truck which had played a part in the alleged crime Ronnie Dale West and Gary Lynn West were convicted on the charge of rape and received sentences of life imprisonment The victim, a 22-year-old woman, alleged that she and a male companion were in an automobile parked near a construction site about 11 p m. on Nov. 22. 1972 when a pickup truck containing three men pulled in front of the vehicle she and her escort were occupying She said two of the individuals got out of the truck, came to the car, knocked her companion unconscious and sexually attacked her with the aid of the third man l-ater, she identified the Wests as the two who attacked herIn the trial the defense was attempting to establish thatofficers at one time thought two other men were involved Stracener testified that a pickup truck fitting thedescription given bv the victim had been reported stolen on Nov. 29,1972. but was found in the possession of two men. one of whom was related to the owner The defense attorney asked Stracener if he looked further into the background of the two men who had been found to have the truck that had been reported stolen.When Stracener said that he had the defense lawyer asked for the results of the investiga tion. Stracener replied, **I found that on Jui.c 18, 1972 there was a warrant issuedby...”Adkisson interrupted Stracener s testimony to ask whether the information had anything to do with the rape trialAfter attorneys argued about whether Stracener should be allowed to proceed with the testimony Adkissonwmade the remarks about receiving pay for the in formation In the Supreme Court opinion. Associate Justice John A. Fogleman said the remark could only have the effect of intimating that the trial judge believed the witness’ testimony was of questionable value