leia ror toe ex-id I have been rderto produce aapectfully that private investi-it me I think I though in doing0 the very ele-ts of a judge or1 equity consult f a judge and iges alone, and juifcy. In such it is tendered jr to judge if it hink it is not, d out, and be-lecide that it is id it forms one its judgment.; therefore the r of the course tter of Sir W. be letter con-ae prosecutionask the prose-of the office of a they read in passages from the court that [. Rose’s re-ve made Sir n which they Sir H. Rose’s object to the x) pursue that arks are good other.f Charlestoncourc declining to mrerrere.The solicitor to the bankrupt thereupon applied for an adjournment of the case, which was ordered.* THE POLICE COURTS.(THIS DAY.)CLERKENWELL.THREATENING TO MURDER A SOLICITOR.Robert Hanslip, a young fellow about 19 or 20 years oE age, was brought up in the custody of Police-constable wu-lingale, oue of the warrant officers of the court, and charged before Mr. Barker for that he did unlawfully use cerUin threats towards Mr. Charles Hanslip, solicitor, of 2, John-street, Bedford-row, whereby he apprehends he goes m danger of his life or of some bodily harm that the said Robert Hanslip will do, or cause to be done unto him,against the peace. , .Mr. Hanslip said the defendant was his son, and for isome time past he had behaved in a very oad way and had threatened to murder him and to smasu him. He (the defendant) said he had a brace of p.sto s loaded, and that he intended to shoot him (complement) w,th them. The defeodent bed written to his uncle to M that be would bam the house on Monday. The defendant behaved in a most shameful manner, breakiog plates and other articles of domestic use: the only reason he (com-plainant) conld assign for the defendant acting in this man-ner was that he would not give him a large sum of money to go about with. The defendant a short time since wanted to go to Poland, and now he wished to go to America. When the defendant was taken into custody he said he had a brace of pistols, but the constable could not hndthM?i Alexander (the clerk)-What have you got to say inanswer to the charge ?The defendant—Nothing at all. # ,The clerk—And you decline to give any explanation.The defendant—I do.The clerk (to the complainant)—Is the defendant snne .Mr Hanslip—The defendant is sane enough. His object in going on in this manner is to extort money from me. 1 have offered him a sum, but he wants considerably morethan I will give him.Mr. Barker said he would remand the prisoner to tue House of Detention for a week, and in the meantime be would be examined by the surgeon, who would determine whether he (the prisoner) was in his right senses or not.The prisoner—Yon can do what you please, it will not have the slightest effect upon me, I can assure you.The prisoner was then removed.