my mind. On one occasion when I was Mr. Bobbins she told me she had writ-1 a note to Mrs. Morris and told me its atents.Mr. Wheat objected to the witness relat-; what Mrs. Bobbins said or what she ted the note contained, rhe witness stated that he desired to cor-it his testimony to do justice to all pdi-3 as his recollection was better now than sterday. He said that the only correc* n he desired to make was that instead of . or Mre. Rutherford having written the te to Mrs. Morris as stated by him yes-day, Mrs, Bobbins wrote it. radge Skinner asked several questions ieh were objected to and withdrawn, rhe witness was then asked in what par* liar his testimony on Thursday was in-■rect and to correct it. Mr. Wheat ob-ted. J udge Bkmner argued the point at gth. Mr. Wheat presented to the court objections to such method of conduct*; the examination.rhe question was decided incompetent, e witness stated that he did not admit ►t he was incorrect yesterday. He sim-did not recollect.Yitness was asked to state any matter m which he was interrogated yesterday ich he did not rempmW then Knf nnwcall the right name he ' thats who I mean.Q—Has he been capabl nary business for the past A—Rdon’t know.Q—At the time of your did he owe Mr. Robbins a A—It Is my opinion t Don’t think there was an Mr. Wood at the time h know that my husband o\ for borrowed money. Th ness transacted after Mr. I en sick between him and ] After I came back frc Robbins asked me about tell what the questions think that now he could business to any great exte bodily infirmities. I do capable either mentally or business to any great exte; three nights before Mrs. the children were amm playing croquet. I was it days before Mrs. Bennett Re-direct—I have not that Mr. Bobbins at the recognized me. He some call the right natne. My jVia At* Art ***■» k/