cM vs David H. Hcnricks—on note —finding for plaintiff $123 88. .Vany Gates vs David H. Henricks and William W. Rigdon—on note—finding for plaintiff $427 67 and attachment proceedings sustained.Albert C. Miller vs David H. Hen-« 1ricks—on note—finding for plaintiff $77 33 and attachment proceedingssustained. ^John Lowdcn vs David H. Henricks—on note—finding for plaintiff $51 and attachment proceedings sustained.First National Bank of Sbelbvville. - . • • •*vs David H Henricks—ou note—find-ing for plaintiff $425 and attachment proceedings sustained.John Elliott vs George W Scott et al—finding for plaintiff and foreclosure of mortgage.John B. McFarlow et al vs Robert T* Phares—on note—finding for plaintiff $55 78.Samuel Hamilton vs Robert T Phares—Mjn note—finding for plaintiff$65 35.• • .Israel Buell, admr etc vs Hugh R Smith and Wm II Crafton—on note— finding for plaintiff #40 90.♦Israel Buell amdt\, c. vs Hugh R. Smith—on note—finding for plaintiff$1,230 12.Israel Buell admr., c. vs William H. Smith and William H* Crafton— on note—finding for plaintiff $92 37. * Thos. Shipp vs David H. Henricks and William N. Willard—on note— finding for plaintiff $259 28 and attachment proceedings sustained.Mary C. Smith vs David H; Henricks—on note—finding for plaintiff $861 00 and attachment proceedings sustained.James Lisher vs David H. Henricks —on note—finding for plaintiff$189 89and attachment proceedings sustained.Pryor Rigdon and Jofin S Gillispievs David II Hendricks—finding forplaintiffs $477 07 and attachment proceedings sustained.