Odor Holds P rough to Answer Under Possession LawIn spile ol’ 1110 eloquence of his attorney in an cfforl to convince the cmirl Mint fhi* odor of sOilo coffer\average sjemli, which leads him. to confound it with the Hlt; f*nt of llu* ■ product ul the s i i I i, H. Prongh whs held under -?oOO honrt This morning!(o The district court on I ho cbarg-?* iof “illegal possession. About Hirer; weeks ago. Trough broke n holtle hi j the* rvHLiuram in Hie IVrrino build-irig sl.alidfijjig. and it b; on account of the!analysis of Mm nilor of its runlenls i and the alleged i■IrrumtfaiR'es sur.rounding the m niter that he wasnrresied.11 is sold hv slate witnesses Ilia I* Trough broke the hoUh* on the ap-npproneh of the „ police, that theodor was; like moonshine whiskey and tlmi therefore it wok moonshine. Trough rays lhat h lie hart coine in lo gel some new coffee In a bottle ennlainmg stale coffee,that 1ho breaking was accident al5 and thill the fact dial it look place on the nppnuu'h of Ihe police was a coincidence* H wan impossible fur the? county chemist to analyze the ‘smell to 'determine whether it contained half a per cent of alcoholic odor, or'-whether 1* was of an intoxicating nature- or not, ho the court had to depend on expert, tea. thnony, which convinced him that he ought to pass it on up to a jury pr 12 compel cut judges in the district court.’ Prosecuting Attorney J‘ W. Taylor represented the state and Attorney O, C- llall the defendant,