luiu mum uy iuu »iiy kjl uiu u»i-lotr ... ..,. . |.| |. . , . f. ,f • * ; r I • «ainam* BiHow.The defeat at Cold Harbor, was. « *mainly attributed to him.—Democratic Dxcfiangc. '•Of all the senseless twaddle that has lately filled the Democratic papers, the above is the most ridiculous. Wo were at Cold IIarbortS Corps, and saw the chargemadoLby Gen. Barlow's Division, the 1st of the-2nd Corps, in conjunction with that of the resjt of theHoe, and we only state what is well* •known, when we say that had all the troops engaged did as well as the 1st Divison, 2nd, Corps, the battle of Cold Harbor would have been a sue-themetDevlt; tfell by the yoi ty! the cti,,nIn*cess. Instead' of reflecting on Gen.Barlow^ the charge is simply an insulHo every man in the Division that boasted of such organizationsmw com=County of las the Irish Brigade, and 61st anddelegate*rfiUti^aCtootKfMon*64th Regiments, N. Y. Y.on roc pie or iiou;yotuiyoIVUfoie e na ba an 1 co