iv jiii.v ................ ■■ jj '•.-.•ac, Aucust .......... 9.81 • 34 9.76 9.7?c. October ............ 9.So 9 6. 9.31 9.G2-9 f3c. December .............. 9.68 9.36 9.03-9.67NEW SUITS FILED.Common Pleas Court.No. 139.430. Charles \V. Upson vs. Cincinnati Realty Company; appeal from Squire Mulier.! H. M. McClure. tNa 139.431. Edward Rrldge* v«. John R.* Jxmg et nl.; for $11,600 on a contract. Outcalt Hickenlooper.No. 189.432. Marie Yaeger vs. Oscar Bailey; arneal from Squire Rolslnger.No. 189,433. City of Cincinnati vs. David S. Knicely et a!.: to assess compensation for land, i E. M. Ballard.No. 199.434. James Oullhert vs The PrecisionMachine Tool and Development Company; fara receiver. Boslinger Kapp.No isO.433. William Knopp vs. Ethel Knopp;’ for divorce. Savage A Savage.No. 139.436. Kate Metyko vs. John Metyko;for alimony. Spangehberg A flpangenberg.No. 139.437 Mary N. Davis vs. James F. Davis: for divorce. A. L.. Dalton.No. 129.438. Hattie Feiler vs. Edward Feiler; for divorce. George J. Slaltne Net. 139.439. The Commercial Gazette Job Printing. Company vs. The Harron-Boyle Company; for a receiver. C. E. Hopping.No. lid). 440. Harburger Bros. vs. Mattie M.Curry- for $434.13 « n account. Ernst Rehin.No. 139.441. K. A I- Shoe Company vs. Mattie M. Curry: for $349.8.) oh account. Ernst R**hm.No. 189,442. Benjamin McKeever vs. Rosalia M. McKeevcr; for divorce. C. S. Sparks.Superior Court.No. 33,833. John Christy vs. Arthur L. Crenshaw et a).f for $10,300 and foreclosure of mortgage. Victor Abraham.