Coirt I'roorkdings —Jonathan P. Horcfield vs. John S. Sutcliffe and Emelina Sutcliffe, his wife. The plaintiff claims that the defendants are indebted to him for work and labor from August 20, 1870, to April 15,1871, iuc-lusive a #1,50 per day. MrsSutcliffe was hold not liable in the present case. John Sutcliffe answers, claiming a set oil and denying the amouut of labor claimed, and also claiming that tho boarding of Ilors-field, during all that time, was $5,00 per week, instead ot as claimed in petition. Trial to Jury. Vetdiet for plaintiff $h»5 Trainer McLave for plaintiff; Datoo, contra.