OiCCdgreatMID* itdifferASKS NEW TIL(VP)rm*dM:*» R*th*r K* I Ur fmrti*r Fu *^ j tort on laundry *!rl. tmlay r*n»we4her to win her '*pa-which ;«.mity“ Mult *r*ln#t A W Cleavert wu j Fullerton laundry man. her mot iontment for a new trial twine heard bySuperior Judge J. O. Mom ur. who Hull jtool the matter under advlaement. 1 Judge H. « Ames denied th* auit•ome week* ago when th* girlcharged that Cleaver wu the fatherof her two-year-old ooa, In the ahaence of Judge Ama*. who i* on \eration. Judge Moncur heard to-day'* ii«otilt;a f«.r a ne». trial, which tea* hoard on a claim that theevidence failed to Justify the court •decision.Attorneys Joaeph Wspner and Thtma» MefMdeg representingM!m Keller, pcifrsted out to the court today evidence gtven at the trial lending to ahow intimacy hefgr—the laundryman and hi* former employe, Defense Attorney* J, ft. Tucker and F. C. Dm mm emphasised the defense testimony, andlater I argued that Judge Honour, who hadUrt'ilatterjut to ~’%hj§ ; itf10 r 3 * r th*Huti*n% *mthatr th* it nm*‘VitO*At» fcr*.taiianantento ait*not heard the testimony, »t.*uldnot b* expected to art **id» the prea- ; judgment of Judge Am#*. whlt;- had *■ and ■ heard and carefully considered allrelop. 1 phase* of th* eaa*At one point during Attorney Wapner* argument regarding the ' gift of « book by Cleaver to klus Keller, Cleaver himaetf interruptedangrily to comment upon th# attorney* argument. The court warnedhim to remain quiet, and he apoi-I ogised.FipH Jud*“* Moncur *aid he would trI ItVl to render hi* decision by tomorrowafternoon.rai ofad?s