WanderingBy Francis Croskey‘You’ve come a long way, aby, to get where you got today,’ # • % • *#++«• i% «§!••» %***•***»* • •DOWN• •Wemort |• • •* •• • •• *« • •• t * *• *By Hazel Imboff glailroad and if weather proved ivorable, would be complete to le Lincoln Highway in 10 days to vo weeks. Rev. W. H. Oswalt ras returned to the Methodist hurch by Methodist Conference r the fifth year. Mrs. H. F. Pe-srs (Leora Stambaugh), organ-t and choir director at the fethodist Church, was honored y choir members with a gift of a Liver vanity case. She resigned s organist after serving 17 ears.Mrs. Sarah Jane Taggart, Orr-ilie pioneer mother, died at the ome of her daughter, Mrs. Kim-eriin, on South Main Street, lorn in Wooster, the last mem-er of a family of six, she reared our children — Col. Elmer Tag-;art of the U. S. Army, Frank, an ttorney in Denver, Col. Howard ’aggart, a passenger agent of the lO Railroad at Baltimore, Md., ind Mrs. Alice Kimberlin of Orr-ille.OHS football team won its first ame of the season with Kent iigh, 12-6. Among team mem-ers were Judy Keevan, Irv Sshelman, Vernon Miller and 2arl Holmes, captain. John Lind-ay, OHS principal, was coach.Weddings that September included those of Clarence Horst ind Helen Shamp of Honeytown y Rev. S. F. Myers of Wooster; Ceely Archer of Lodi and Pearl Cing by Rev. F. S. Zaugg of booster; Shirley Bohlen and Florence Shank by Rev. Nesbitt )i Wooster; Chester Smith and ?aye Weaver, graduate of OHS in 917, at Akron; and Clarence Ba-ter and Ada Board. Daughters vere born to the Virgil Georges, Snos Smiths, Sam Kohlers andL. Grays; sons to the Roy Ger-larts, J. M. Webbers and E. D. Arnolds in Cuyahoga Falls (the former Esther Schmid of Orr-rille).Appearing at the Grand Fheater were such favorites as 21ara Kimball Young in “Trilby,” Billie Rhodes in “The Blue E^bnnet” and Frank Keenan in ‘Dollar for Dollar.”chants a voice on one of the television commercials advertising cigarets made especially for women.No doubt, women have come a long way since the early 1900’s when they had to sneak off to the barn or basement to smoke a eig-aret. My only question is where are they going tomorrow?Last week I did an interview for the Wooster paper with five local resident — three women and two men — asking them their views on the Women’s Liberation Movement. After talking with them, I can see that there are pros and cons for either side. (Previously, I had never really seriously considered the matter, though I had read several articles about it. You might say I was apathetic, or just a* member of the great silent majority.)I don’t support the bra-burners or radical faction of the movement. But, unfortunately, they are the ones who are drawing attention. However, credit also must be given to the campaigners and pamphlet passers who are doing just as much good in a quiet way. They’re distributing literature to inform the general public — and that’s half the battle.Biggest gripes that women have are employment and job discriminations against them, I strongly believe that in many instances, they really have a right to complain. There are many situations where women employes are underpaid. Labor statistics for last year (and please remember that I quote this from memory) showed that women received only about $69 for doing a comparable job that men were paid $100 to do.If my subtraction hasn’t failed me, that’s a $31 difference. Wouldn’t you be upset? The thing that women are fighting for is ‘cold, hard cash’ and 1 can’t say that I blame them.The argument of many is that the woman’s place is in the home —* cleaning, cooking and taking care of the children. So what if a female is unmarried and is trying to make a career out of a certain job? She should stand by and play second fiddle to her male equals? Or should she get married even if she doesn’t want to. That’s hardly realistic.What about women who have to work to make ends meet? You know, the kind that if they didn’t work, there wouldn’t be any home to clean? Think about that.