Hide Article Text (OCR)
lainorofbety.Dgdi-in-ofar-ie-ofiyscd'edI is*ledhislp-eaheoftheyo.ualdtdyforItsurtof to ioeneeliin8thhesedpofourofub-P.k.ldgub-iDg'tra-NBAllsedme,ntl-thetierFourth Insertion.TermSlingluff Slingluff, Solicitors, FidelityBuilding.IN The Circuit Court No. 2 of BaltimoreCity.-(10 A. 180-1001.)- Joseph K. Smithand Fielder C. Slingluff, administrators ofMary Boggs vs. John L. H. Smith, Joseph R.Smith and Fielder C. Slingluff, administratorsof Joseph Smith, Jr.; Margaret Fisher, Susan Boggs, F. Henry Boggs, Robert J. B. Boggs, Alexander L. Boggs. Jr., Alexander Boggs and William H, Boggs and the Unknown Heirs of Mary Boggs.The object of this suit is to procure a decree of interpleader against John L. H. Smith, Joseph it. Smith and Fielder C. Slingluff, administrators of Joseph Smith. Jr., MargaretFisher, Susan Boggs F, Henry Boggs, Robert J. B. Boggs. Alexander L. Boggs, Jr., Alexander L. Boggs and William H. Boggs, and the unknown heirs of Mary Boggs, wno departed this life in Deoember, 18h6, warning them to appear in this court, in person or by solicitor, on or before the 14th day of June, A. I). 1901, and then and there prove their relation* ship to Mary Boggs, and their right to a distributive share of the fund in the hands of Joseph R. smith and Fielder C. Slingluff, administrators of Mary Boggs, if any theyhftV6*The bill sets out that Joseph Smith, Jr„ departed,this life, intestate, in 1896, and that among the papers that came into the hands ot his administrators was an insurance policy in the Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance Company of Hartford, Connecticut, for twenty-five hundred dollars (S26b0); that said sum of money has been colleoted by the administrators of Mary Boggs and is now held by them for distribution subject to the future order of this court*It lurther sets out that Mary Boggs departed this life in December, 1866, and from that time to his death, in 1896, Joseph Smith, Jr., paid the premiums due upon said polioy, but did not in any way ohacge the bene-fioiary thereof, who was Mary Boggs.It is thereupon ordered, this 29th day ofApril, A. D. 1901,by the Circuit Court No.2 ofBaltimore olty,that the said plaintiffs.by causing a oopy of this order to be inserted in some daily newspaper published in the oity ofBaltimore, once in each of four successiveweeks before the 29th day of May, A. D. 1901. giving notioe to any and all of the heirs of Mary Boggs, deceased, and warning them to appear in this court, in person or by solicitor, on or before the 14th day o* June, 1901, to prove their relation to the said Mary Boggs and their right to a distributive share of the funds in the hands of Fielder C. Slingluff and Joseph R. Smith, acminlBtrators, andshow cause, if any they have, why a decreeought not to pass as prayed in this bill*J. UPSHUR DENNIS.True copy—Test;a30m7,14,2lALFRED J. SCHULZ,Clerk.m21.JohrVALNOS. 1By vi of Bal will se on WE at 6 o’i OF G1 the Cfollowi Begii ot Gayfrom Con Gay thence alley; t ern sid inches, 116 lelt;Begiiaide ofeusterlcentre feet toon thialley 1 erly 11tbeooeto the Back BRICi Back JannuaTern in sixoption to bea be sec A deof salem21Bald?VAI1 J. Fred, lieuuardt.Attorney.Enultahle Rlrft?By ?No. 2 trust*premliat 4.8a nr u
Newspaper Details
The Daily Record
Baltimore, Maryland, US
Tue, May 21, 1901
Page 2
Full Page
Clipped by
Debby B.
TX, USA 06 May 2020
Other Publications Near Baltimore, Maryland
Baltimore Sun
Baltimore Daily Exchange
Baltimore Der Deutsche Correspondent
Baltimore Commercial Journal And Lyfords Price Current
Baltimore American Republican And Daily Clipper
