THE CUMBERLANCn luduo's Opinion-I (Continued (torn Pa^e(of the prop^Hy is tsr more thani would he received it it were sold, come for farm purpose^. and more than - would he received if it were wasdeveloped and old as lot? All the l'omniday. u teri “t* d in the prop« rty SfxJhan ;,t, n fa\oi of ;?« '•■ale. Then e roinhno doubt that the proposed sale is’four j 'io.»n ,iutato all concerned and the •r ofl that it is mostend „ favorahl* off- r will aK.orj he nf WiJn at ,,,,« „ -fi* 1 it f hr dg,t'1 So (f a* the previous sale*- wereare ('on* erned. they were mad'®r' Hi ,, fair price and on# which wa* merit. (5 tell \r the life tenant f)|(wnsand her four children. All of them jit?la (1 the deed' hut a ha* ta-en ,oer' pointed out one of th« four ha» ^.)V h\ttf Iti( lt;da d • avmg children and amj fa possibility of the death i,,lK nf othei children prior to the death p of th» Ilf# tenant and themselves 0blt; ,hlt; h[ ha in; children the judge con rimnlt;!,ibllnffiirn Prf*In lt;oftlt; lustofK Judgt Hendei sona rites: I gtilf . . Ig'sl i hr triaef t ’The trustee f to be appointed by ;«ilt;f«# c -j f the courts will be ordered to }omjable «#.r 11; the deeds from the present fundiowneri to the Pittsburgh Plitr s fuMs hr Glass Company conveying the jmproted I property previously conveyed tOjaeitt j flit n owners by the I dr tenant end j^f (' her children This b because the fjrij pless a* if made rnnioly to pro- jlt;*d p,is* j vide the funds 1'fi#€es§#ry for theI ma intsfliiict i nd com fort ’ * of I immetI Km hr! Hinas. These sales would |^umj have bf rn approved at the time Routeihv thi** emir! had the question been *,*j He|before it The purcha§er§ of thesnj^'ill i proper tirs (might them m good? ^ of!faith and have improved them in i u . *f ....._ / . M that ri*r*f venous wnyt. Such sales can now I ^v^iiilail be i at if ied “nunc pro tunc *' * rOU|4*t !crre to the above effect vul? be iwere *yjilf ned when presented by counsel |# m tit locatorfor Mrs Hlosa «loverncj to warej Koute