JULYIIf*;*FOUND NOT GUILTYr»vSuperior Com: Juryin Poison CaseLEK FAR ML'. IJu!T Session RcCt d hv * *Judge William Burnsnes inVerdict.A jury In Sup*: ven:; ■ 'jt no-noon tor Amade-or Court re Its yester Cadun* I!old but', ner ot L* oxt air:(\! att-mptedr? I aay aft-er-51 years S for al-: A:t: n d lor al-x;d Withn p..u•d i las*Macerl, Lee lumbermar iegedly mingling auwn. candy said to hate be Mace:.. mad b* x 1 *ed three da--.- W.a n • he \e: act w.u-returned. J . . c William A B irr.- recessed ecu;-In the Cadenelli case it w.u introduced as e\idenee that Mace:i andMrs Cade no a: had been uni England, Mo ■•turned to th -5 S. Camer n:aicialtutionsfriendly and Maeeri had aL-o bo n familiar with Cadenell; daushhT. Lena.Closing' arguments wore deliver*' i by At tv. James. A Hannon . f Lre h r Cadenelli and Dial. At:v ThotnaF Mortarty for the c* mnmnwe.iith Judge Burns' charge to the jury consumed about 40 minute.-.Mrs. Cadenelli was on the witne-* stand in rebuttal for the commonwealth yesterdav as court remmed A letter written by her to her accused husband was read. It -aid in part: “I can no longtr sh w m m It because I am si - ashamed that I haw no pea e . . I also know that I am wrlt;In an-aver to Attv M-nartyshe .'.ed site was ashamed ’oe-ause Cadenelli talked about her in town and that she felt she w us wrong in not leaving her husband si oner.