Winnipeg Free Press (Newspaper) - March 28, 2015, Winnipeg, Manitoba C M Y K PAGE A4
A 4 WINNIPEG FREE PRESS, SATURDAY, MARCH 28, 2015 TOP NEWS winnipegfreepress. com
oreckcanada. com
The Portable
Furnace
Great for cottages!
Heats up to 800 square feet.
Takes only as much power as
a coffee maker.
8 l b .
Upright Vacuum
So powerful, it picks up a
16- pound bowling ball.
Air Purifier
Professional
Series
Removes 99% of dust,
smoke, pollen/ pollution. $ 299
Spring Spring
into into into Spring Spring
SALE!
THE ORECK CENTRE
657 Century Street 204- 977- 3702
CENTRE
W INNIPEG businessman Art DeFehr says
relocating the rail lines outside the Perimeter
Highway would cost roughly $ 700 million
but free up hundreds of acres of prime land for
high- density housing and rapid transit and shrink
the chances of a Lac- Mégantic- type disaster.
But Mayor Brian Bowman says relocating the
rail yards and lines isn’t a priority in the short
term, and he needs to do more research to determine
whether it might be one in the long run.
In a recently penned position paper, DeFehr,
CEO of Palliser Furniture Holdings Ltd. and a
longtime rail buff, argues the city must tackle the
hundreds of kilometres of rail lines that entangle
it, costing millions in bridges and overpasses and
stymying the growth of a genuine intercontinental
transportation hub.
Instead, DeFehr proposes a single right- of- way
for the Canadian National and Canadian Pacific
railways that runs south of the Perimeter and includes
a state- of- the art yard somewhere between
Oak Bluff and Elie. That would reduce heavy- truck
traffic off roads such as Kenaston Boulevard and
free up corridors into every corner of the city for
rapid transit, bike paths and infill housing. DeFehr
said the most potent argument for rail relocation
may be hazardous materials would no longer pass
through the city, past residential neighbourhoods
and through the downtown.
In 2013, 47 people were killed and half of downtown
Lac- Mégantic was destroyed when a train
carrying crude oil derailed and exploded in the
Quebec town. The incident renewed fears about
the transportation of hazardous materials by
train, especially through populated areas.
DeFehr’s five- page position paper, which has
been circulated recently to local politicians, planners
and business leaders, pegs the price of relocating
the lines at $ 1 billion, a figure DeFehr
said is just an estimate but one that’s aligned with
comments made by a senior CN executive.
Since the rail companies were originally given
their land at no cost and paid no taxes it for decades,
DeFehr suggests CN and CP give the land
back to the city as their contribution to relocation.
DeFehr pegged the value of that land at $ 300 million,
putting rail relocation’s net cost to taxpayers
at $ 700 million.
In the next several years, government will likely
spend nearly as much on new bridges and grade
separations alone, including at least $ 175 million
on the Waverley Street underpass, $ 250 million on
a wider Marion Street over the CP tracks and a
new Arlington Street Bridge. Those costs are not
factored into DeFehr’s $ 700 million rail- relocation
price tag.
“ We need to ‘ stop the train’ in a literal sense and
stop building infrastructure that serves no purpose
other than to dodge obstacles that should not
be there in the first place,” wrote DeFehr.
Rail relocation has a long and hesitant history
that dates to the late 1970s when the city proposed
extending Sherbrook Street over the CP yards into
the North End. More recently, the Social Planning
Council of Winnipeg has championed the
idea, suggesting the first step is to do a feasibility
study. But many say the move is a costly pipe
dream contingent on the willingness of stubborn
rail companies to relocate.
Armed with DeFehr’s paper, Winnipeg Centre
NDP MP Pat Martin raised the rail- relocation
issue in a meeting with Bowman earlier this
month. Bowman said Friday he hadn’t yet read
DeFehr’s report, but planned to.
“ It may be something long- term that may be
something worthy of looking into, but it’s not the
top priority right now,” said Bowman, adding fixing
the roads is his main concern.
“ I’m open to listening.”
maryagnes. welch@ freepress. mb. ca
WHERE WOULD THE TRACKS GO?
. The main line: Both CN and CP’s main lines
run through the heart of Winnipeg: CP’s through
the North End and CN’s through the south and
then past The Forks. Art DeFehr proposes one
new route for both railways south of the city.
Beginning near Portage la Prairie, the existing CN
right- of- way could be widened to accommodate
both companies. Then, a new track could be created
near Elie running south of Oak Bluff, north
of LaSalle, across the Red River just south of the
floodway and joining each company’s existing
main- line tracks east of the city.
. The rail yards: There are several marshalling
yards in Winnipeg, in the North End and in
Transcona. DeFehr proposes combining those
yards somewhere between Elie and Oak Bluff. A
new facility would allow for state- of- the- art linear
yards long enough for modern trains. Locating the
rail yards southwest of the Perimeter Highway is
at odds with the city’s new inland port, Centre-
Port, which DeFehr believes is poorly located.
. An intermodal terminal: Those, like the one
operated by CN in Transcona, allow cargo to
switch from trains to trucks and vice versa.
DeFehr suggests building a single shared
intermodal terminal just outside the Perimeter,
allowing truck traffic to make better use of Winnipeg’s
ring road.
A vision of a city without rail lines
Businessman’s plan would relocate traffic outside Perimeter
By Mary Agnes Welch
PHIL HOSSACK ( LEFT); KEN GIGLIOTTI ( RIGHT) / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS
Art DeFehr ( right) says relocating the rail lines would free up hundreds of acres of land for housing and rapid transit. He says it would cost about $ 700 million.
A_ 04_ Mar- 28- 15_ FP_ 01. indd A4 3/ 27/ 15 9: 28: 34 PM