Internet Payments

Secure & Reliable

Your data is encrypted and secure with us.
Godaddyseal image
VeraSafe Security Seal

Lethbridge Herald Newspaper Archives

- Page 21

Join us for 7 days to view your results

Enter your details to get started

or Login

What will you discover?

  • 108,666,265 Obituaries
  • 86,129,063 Archives
  • Birth & Marriages
  • Arrests & legal notices
  • And so much more
Issue Date:
Pages Available: 22

Search All United States newspapers

Research your ancestors and family tree, historical events, famous people and so much more!

Browse U.S. Newspaper Archives

googlemap

Select the state you are looking for from the map or the list below

OCR Text

Lethbridge Herald, The (Newspaper) - August 13, 1970, Lethbridge, Alberta August 13, 1970 THE IETHBRIDGE HERAU) Your Sma suggested, at least it's a. start in the right direction. The new court system authored by Justice Minister John Turner, himself a noted tax law practitioner before his entry into public life, will do much to expedite the processing of disputes between taxpayers and Government. 'Tha Tax Appeal Board which hears the vast majority of But cases will disappear, as such, and will re-appear under a new name The Tax Review Board. The change; in name reflects1 tlie reduction in formality of proceedings. It is apparently intended that hearings of tax disputes will continue to be simple and less immeshed in legal logistics than is normally encountered. The make-up of the Board will now guarantee French Canadian representation by statute rather than by custom. Either the Chairman or Assistant Chan-man must be a Judge or lawyer from Quebec. Tlie statute establishing the new Board specifically spells out that hearings are to be informal and devoid of the technical and sometimes anachronistic rules of evidence and legal procedure. For example, a taxpayer need not be represented by a lawyer but is free to present his own case or use an agent. The Tax Review Board will be bound to hold its hearings privately if the taxpayer so requests. This carry-over from the Tax Appeal Board rules is designed to ensure a taxpayer privacy regarding his financial affairs should he feel a public disclosure might injure him in his business. Unfortunately the privacy provision does not go quite as far as it should because although the hearing may be in camera, the judgment of the Board which must necessarily identify the taxpayer and refer to the specifics of his financial affairs, is still a public document open to the scrutiny of all. On this score it should be remembered that until a few years ago one could appeal a tax assessment, lay before the Board his entire business affairs and be guaranteed anonymity both in the hearings and in the published judgment of the case. It is still felt by many personal tax consultants that the publicity of a tax case inhibits many taxpayers from exercising their right to dispute their tax assessments. Perhaps the most significant and welcome change in the rules is that which provides that if the Board renders a judgment in favor of the taxpayer and the Crown appeals the case further, then unless the amount of tax in dispute exceeds the' Government must pay all of the taxpayer's legal costs of the case. This is designed to protect taxpayers from having to finance the cost of the Government, wishing to establish a legal precedent by taking a case involving little tax all through the Courts, until a favorable judgment is obtained. While Justice Minister Turner is to be commended for this step toward making justice more acceptable to all Canadians, he will know himself that this gesture is insufficient. The legal costs of exercising one's right to quarrel with the state have become so high that the vast majority of Canadians cannot afford a contest with the Crown. What useful purpose is served when a country has a most enlightened set of laws, and provides ample remedies for citizens who are abused by bureau-racy, but the cost of availing oneself of that protection and seeking those remedies is beyond the financial reach of most citizens. Obviously the enlightened law reform program, already auspiciously launched in many areas by Mr. Turner, cannot be considered complete until the law provides that any citizen who is called upon to account to his Government before the Courts, whether on a tax matter or otherwise, should only dt> so at the public's and not his own expense. Tte second phase of tax court reform currently before Parliament is the Bill to bury the present Exchequer Court and reincarnate it as the hew Federal Court. The legislation goes seme distance toward streamlining the old Court into a modern, more efficient and more appropriately entitled body in which most disputes over Federal legislation will be heard. Included in its jurisdiction is the duty to hear appeals from the newly created Tax Review Board, as well as the responsibility to hear tax cases taken directly to that Court. As with the Tax Review Board, representation from the Quebec Judiciary is guaranteed, but unfortunately, no other region of Canada is assured membership on this important The Federal Court is to be divided into two sections: the Trial Division which will hoar cases in the first instance, and, the other, the Federal Court of Appeal to which one may appeal an adverse judgment of the Federal Court Trial Division. The Appeal Division is also authorized to Irear certain appeals from decisions of Government appointed Boards, Tribunals and Commissions, such as the CRTC, and the like. This embellishment of civil rights is commendable. In order to spare the Canadian Supreme Court tte onerous duty of hearing countless tax cases which might otherwise be appealed all the way from the Tax Review Board, to the Federal Court Trial Division, to the Federal Court of Appeal and then to the Supreme Court, some reasonable limitations have been imposed on the kind of tax cases that can reach the highest Court. These reforms of the judicial mechanism regulating tax dis-putes do not go nearly as far as "fr. Turner's growing audience of admirers might have expected. They are not of the same caliber that characterized his Criminal Code reforms, the new bail law and the forthcoming invasion of privacy legislation. But, it's a workable beginning. (Mr. Asper Is a Winnipeg Vancouver, Ca (Supplied by Doherty, LAST BID Quotes) WESTERN OILS Int UNI Pfd Almincx -1.95 Int Stool Asornerti 1050 Jell Lake Banff Joulel B. p. Oil 4.15 Kaiser Res Can South 3.50 Kam Koto Cdn Exp Go! 4.55 Uko Onl P Cdn Grldoll 7.00 Menlor Cdn Home 695 Newconex Cdn Ind Gas 9'.12Vj Pac Pete Cdn Long Is .75 Rank Orgar Cdn Super 30.50 Shell Inv Cent Del Rio 9.80 Shell Inv P Charter 625 Shell Inv W Chleffan Sicks Ralni Dome Pete 52.75 West Cdn S Dynam Pete 1.60 Wnlte and French Pela 615 CAL< Gt Plains 23.75 Acroll Mill City 1 at Anac Pete New Cont 1.37 Barons 01 Numsc 6.15 Norlh Cont Permo 1.10 Plains Pet Petrol 122 West Warn Place Gas 1.06 Quinalta Ponder 53 Rexdale Ranger PIPELIHI Scurry Rain U7S 6as T Spooner. 1.35 Al a Gas N West Decal 5.50 Cdn Wst Na MISCELLANEOUS ullflh ixiniKToiAi i e Norm-Centra INDUSTRIALS North-Cent Alco Indus 1025 Gn Metro Aquataine Trans can Brit Nfld Cp 4.20 Tran Can P Cdn Brew A 29.25 Trns Can P Cdn Brew B 3S.25 Westcoast Cdn Hyd'Carb 13.87V4 Western Pac Cdn Pac Inv 21.75 MUTUAL CPR Pfd e.So AGF Speclfl Crows Nest In 41.00 All Cdn Co Cygnus A -1.90 All Cttn D! Cygnus B All Cdn Ve Gt Cdn Oil Amer Grow Gt Cdn Oil Sd 100.00 Can Grow Home Oil A 17.00 Cdn tnvost Home Oil B Collect Mut Hud Bay Co 1425- Cmnwlth In Hud Bay OH Cmnwlth Le Hugh Rus Pfd 19.62V3 Corp inves Husky Oil 9.75 Corp tn St Oil War. 3.90 Drey Fd Int Pro Pipe 9.75 Growth Eq TORONTO MINI Supplied by Richardst LAST BID a.m. Quotes) a.r INDUSTRIALS Molsons B Abltlbi North, Cent Alcan 20.75 Pemblna Pp Atgoma Steel Power Corp Atco Ind 70.12 Va Price Co Allan Sugar 6.00 Rothmans Bell Tel 42.00 St Law Cor Brazil Trac 13.00 Shell CDA B.C. Tel 59.00 Simpson's Burns 8.50 Simp Sears B.C. Forest 73.i2'A Steel of Car B.O- Sugar T5.12V4 Selkirk A CAE Ind 4.05 Texaco Cdn Brew 7.1 2W Traders Gp Chemcell -1.55 Trans Mtn Col Cellulose 5.00 Trans Can Cal Power 22.2S Union Gas Coron Credit 1.05 Union Oil CWN Gas 9.50 Versatile W Cdn Indust ,9.00 Wesieel Canada 55.. 22.00 Union Car Cdn Marconi 3.25 Weston's B Cdn Vickers 5.25 Woodward's Chrysler 19.25 West Cdn S CPR 54.50 Zenith Cominco 21.12% BA Cons Bath ?.87Va Cons Gas 16.00 can imper Dist Sea 44.62Vi Dom Bridge 16.12% Domfar 12.62% Dom Textile 11.50 Tor-Dom Dom Stores 12.25 Ml Dome Pete 53.00 Acme Kam Play 53.00 Advocate As Fd of Amer