British Press Newspaper Archives

- Page 1

Issue Date:
Pages Available: 4

About British Press

  • Publication Name: British Press
  • Location: London, Middlesex
  • Pages Available: 18,648
  • Years Available: 1803 - 1825
Learn More About This Publication


  • 2.17+ Billion Articles and Growing Everyday!
  • More Than 400 Years of Papers. From 1607 to Today!
  • Articles Covering 50 U.S.States + 22 Other Countries
  • Powerful, Time Saving Search Features!
Find Your Ancestors Now

View Sample Pages : British Press, April 14, 1820

Get Access to These Newspapers Plus 2.17+ Billion Other Articles

OCR Text

British Press (Newspaper) - April 14, 1820, London, Middlesex Number 5415. -4- LONDON, FRIDAY* APRIL 14, 1820. Price 7d. THEATRB.ROYAL, DnUItrJcANB. HIS EVENING, FKIUAY/Ai.r.l U, liis Majesty's Sei-ratils will perform Ihd Comedy'of' THE HVPOCRHB. lli.rlor-Canlwell, Mf. l)i>�lun ; Col. I.iinildTl, Jlr. Ppn-t.v, Dariilcy. Mr. Hull�ii'l; SimvhimI, .Mr. Hariiard ; l\raw. �-,irin,'Mr. O.vbcrry. Cliii liitin, Mit. F.Mwiii; ('>lil l-a>ly I.smberl, Mrs. Hirlowe; Yoiiiij; Lady Lambert, Mts. Orgor. Tu wliicli will be addedj 6lh time, a Broad Farcical Paiito-mimical Drama, in two actti, entitled SHAKSPEAKE P'/iKSUS HAllLEQUIN. Harlequin, Mr. Harley ; Corjioral Baiince, Mr. Duwion ; Gascunade, Mr. Ualtie; Joe Snip, Mr. Munden ; Ahraliam, Mr. Knight; Simon, Mr. Oxberry; For?e, Mr.UluRsell; Taffy, Mr. Hughes; Mercury, Mr. T. Cooke; First Justice, Mr. Butler. Mrs. Snip, Mrs. Harluwe; Dolly Snip, Ma-dame Vestris; Sukey Chitterlin, Miss Povry. The Doors will be opened at Half-past Sixo'Ctock; the Ferfurmaiice will commence precisely at Seven. Boxes 78.;^ Second Price 3s. 6d:-Pit Ss. 6.1.; Second Price 2�.-Lower Gallery 2s.;' Si;cund Price Is.-L'pper Gallery Second Price 6r .M'Intyre, Mr. Abbott. Mist Isabella U'arduur, Mi.^s .Siepliens; MTss Maria M'lalyre, Mi�s Maltlirus; Mi.'is Ciriselda Oldbuck, Mrs, Davenport ; Elspelh of the Craig-burijfoot, Mrs. Faucit. After which, lOlh time, a new Pantomime, called HARLEQUIN AND CINDERELLA; Or, THE LITTLE GLASS SLIPPER. Prince Alcdore (afterwards Harle(in in), RJr. Etiar ; Baron Pumpu k u and Shares, if bought li- fiire the 27tb this Muuih, will have the tame Chance fur the 4.. m .. Prizes of......jt*30,000 2......Prizes of...... 20,000 2.....Prists of ...... 10,000 Also for the whole uf the 102 Capitals, and for every other Prize ip the Lottery (except the 30/. Prizes that have been drawn), as if they had beeii bought befure the Preliminary Drawing. N. B.-Two Prizes of 20,000/. 3 per Cent. Consols, MUST BE DRAWN 27th this Month, when ibo TWO FIRST. DRAWN PRIZES will Gain 20,000{. each, in additiua Iff whatever Prizes tbey may be drawn. Tickets and Shares are .Selliiig by CARROLL, Cootraclor, No. 19, Corohill, and 26, Oxford-street, London; who Shared and S.dd, in the last few months, 2,387, 30,000/.; 706, Si.eoot, 1,345,20,000/.; 7,003,5,000/.; 2,296, 9,000/.&c. *#* CARROLL iias Ageali ia all the piincipal Tuwat thrpasfaout (be Couotry. ARMY CONTRACTS. COMHISMRIAT: DbPARTMBUT, TRBAfimT- Cbambbrs, Afril 6, mo. TW'OTICE is herebt/ given lo alt Hersont desir-oii� ofContraeNng io Supply BEEF and MUTTO Y for the Usifif the Army, viz.- To his Majesty's Laud Forces in Cantonments, Quarters, and Barracks, in the ttud^r-tnaOlioned Counties : Berks (iscluding Cumberland, ing Holy Island), . the Town of Derby, ' I.flnca�ter, Hungerford), Devon, Northumberland, Chester, Dorliam (includ- Warwick. That the deliveries are to commence on and fur the 25lh day of May next; tl)at Proposals in Writing, sealed up. and marked "Tender for Army Supplies," will be received at this Onice, ou or befure Tuesday the 2d day of May next, (Jnit none w"" be received after Twijive o'Clork on that day), and if sent by post, the postage must be paid. Proposals must be made separately fur each County, and �icb Proposal must have the Letter whiclr it auiiex>'by Tjvo Persons of knuwi> Pruperly engaging to become bound wjth the party temierini; la the amonnt slated in (be printfd particulafsj fur, the due per-furipan^e 9f.tllei^]>lnM:t';.,i be uaticed nfttte�rmai!lc'on a pruati.1^enivfi-iittd the.-^et*' ic^^ in; wordij at- i^irgtll^, and sliOuM it so baitprii' that during' the cooiiilufuce uF.tbe Contract no Troaps should be tup. plied by virtue of the sam^, the aaioiint of th^ Stomps on the Contract and Bond,'paid in the first' instance by the Contractor, will be lefubded to him. Particulars of the Contracts may be bad upon application at these Chambers, bet ween the hours of Eleven and Five, and at the Office of Deputy CuniinisBary-General Young, Edinburgh. npHE FRIENDSttfTHOS. WILSON. Esq. JL will DINE together at the City of London Tavern, on WCDNESDAV, the I9tii ioalaut, at Halfrpaat Five o'clock, to niebrale bli klE-ELECTlON aa REPRESENTATIVE of this Ciif in PftrjUnient. JOSEPH HARRY ATT, Esq. M.P. in the Chair. Tick�>t� (l/.each) may be had To-morrow, and sulisequent days, by applicalipn to the Secretary of Jlie Csnimitlte, at the Tavern, and no more will be issued than the Room can accommodate. GUlLDHALLL, LONDON, Apbil, 12, 1820. THE COMMITTEE for Let.i.iir the City's Lands will meet at Guildhall on TUESDAY, flic 25th day of April Inst, at Twelve o'Clock at Noon, to LET by PUBLIC AUCTION, A Building lease form Years, from Midsummer Day nCKt, of a PIECE of GROUND on the East side of Duke-street, Aldg^te, and ou the West anIBERS and FRIENDS of this SOCIETY, wilUte held at the Freemasons' TaTern, on MONDAY NEXT, i ttiel^fh instant; 7 '---^ WILLIAM LEAKE, Esij. ia the Chair. btevtabds, COTTAGE FOUR UTTrES FRO.V THE ROYAL . EXCtrANGE,'; Pleasantly situated at New.Cross, Surrey, near the end of Peckbam-taae, iu the high road tu Greenwich, Black-heath, &c. . , ' . . npHE LEASE TO BE SOLD of a neat and "l. coran^oVlioVs DWELLING .MQUSB, in the Cottage Style; contprisiijg sixBeiLchambera and a Dressing-room, four Sitllng-ruums (two of which communirale by handsome folding doors), a oupveoient Kitchen and Wash-lionse adjoining, with spring and raio Wa,l�;r�, ^ ^pd ilry Cellaring, &c. jtc; a .laWDNdb^Jw Ctarden,, wailed round, Onirttn front, planWd wiifTSIvdliii, &c. The Hbdse has lately iieen much improved, and is in excellent repair. lii>-mediate pussessiov may be bad. A few Fixtures (which will not exceedSOI.).are to be taken al a fair Valuation. *,* Stage Coaches pass to ami' from London every half-hour. For Tickets to view the Premises, and Reference for the Terms) Isx. apply tu Mr. Walsh, Ijiw Statiqner, Inner Temple-lane. CHESHIRE ASSIZES. . said Harrison, " petition the .Sovereign nor if Lords, in its present corrupt �tate- Nnthl. Vltchesun, F.a.s. T. H. Budd Thomas Downes r. Hall William Hine William Y. Knight J.Pullen H. Strallon George Spence F. Turner James Western William Wright. Tickets, 21s. each, maybe bad of the Stewards; or of the Secretary, No. 5, Inner Temple-lane, London. Dinner ou Table at iralf-past Five precisely. JAMES ANDERTON, Secretary. ' . � . ^ � This day are published, price Is. IT^VIDEiVCES of CHRISTIANITV. stat.-.! _i to an ingrnuous Mind doubtful of its authority ; in a Letter to a Gentleman. . By the Rev. JAMES BEAN, M.A. One of the Librarians of the British Museum, and Assistant Minibter of VVelbeck Chapel, St. Maryle-Bone. Printed for F. C. and J. Rivingtoo, No. 62, St. Paul's Cburcb-yard, and No. 3, Waterloo-place, Pall-mall. Of whom may he had. The AUTHOR'S OTHER WORKS. This day is published, by JOH N H ARDING,36, St. James's-Blreet, ATREATISE on the MANAGEMENT of HEDGES and HEDGE-ROW TIMBER. By FRANCIS BLAIKIE, Steward and Agent to T. W. Coke, Esq. Second Eishop of Canterbury, piice Sil. lOs. iu boards on mcdiitm, and 3/. 12s. ou roval paper, rglHE BOOK of COMMON PRAYER, with M.. Notes Explanatory, Practical, and Historical, from approved Writers of-the Church of England, selected aud arranged By the Rev. RICHARD MANT, D.D. Rector of St. Botolph's, Bisliopsgate, and of East Hortley, Surrey ; and Domestic Chaplain to bis Grace the Archbishop of Canterbury. Oxford: Printed for J. Parker ; and F. C. and J. Rlving-tou, St. Paul's Cburch-yard and Waterloo,place, London-; sold also by Messrs. Deighton and Nicholsons, Cambridge; and by all Booksellers in town ami country. *** A republication of this Work, in Parts, will commence on the 1st of June, and will be cuitlinned Monthly, at 4s. on medium, and 8s. on royal paper. This day is published, in 4 vols. l2ino. price 22s. DE CLIFFORD; or, Pas^^mu loore powerful than Reason : A Tale. Printed for A. 'K. Newman liinl Co. Leadenhatl.slreet. The following will be pabliabed in a short time: GWELYGORDD; or, the CImM of Sin. By Charles Lucas, A..M, Autlwrof the Idffrual Quixote, &c. 3 �.ls. IRELAND ; or, Memoira of the MonUgue Family : a Novel. 3 vols. THE ONE PODND NOTE ; a Tale of Mid-Lolhiao, and other Tales. -By Francis Lalhom. 3 vols. '  VERY HTRANGB, BUT VERY TRUE; or, the His- giry ofan Old Mau'a Young Wife. Second Edition ; 4 vols, y Francis 'Ltthom. iVEST INDIAN; or, the Brdlher*. ^ vols, ' - THE CRUSAUERS: an Hiflorical Romance. By Louin Sidney Staubope. 5 vuls. ' ' (Concluded from our Paper of Yiiierday.) TUESDAY, APRIL 11. SECOND DAY. � The Court, though crowded this morning, had not to boast of so tlirongrd an audieiiee as were yesterday assembled lo hear the trial of Sir Charles Wolseley. When Ibedefeoce was last night closed, many-were of optuion that the Baronet was acquitted; and we have beard that be was cheered in-conse-queuce of this upiniwu from the Castle to bis luilgings. A few momenta after the arrival of the Learned Judges this mornin?, Mr. Ben yon (Attorney-General for Chester) commenced his reply.--" Gentlemen uf the Jury, I now beg leave lo en. treat your attention while 1 reply-to the observations made b^ the defendants, and offer such comments on the evidence as the nature of my case demand^ ' We must first. Gentlemen, recur lo the charge made against llie defendants, for it has been endeavoured to put a different interpretation on it, from that which it requires; and we shall also have lo consider the legality of one of the counla of the indictment, to which some oljections' have been taken by Ibe Learned Counsel for Sir Charles Wolsdey^ We have alleged, first, ttiat these parties assembled an un. lawful assembly, an assembly calculated to disturb Ibe public |>eace, aud by different means lo excite in the minds of the people a contempt and haired of Ibe Go-vernmeut.and Conslitntioo of the realm as by law establisb-ed. T,his general allegation appears lo nie to contain two offences-first, that of assembling an unlawful assembly; and, secondly, byseditioas words and other meaus inciting: tbe people to cuntempt aud Mtred of the Canititution aa l>y4asr cataiiHalMd. -^liespiBr f��* ^ " 7. endeavoured lo impress it on'^ur minds, that the assembly wAs not unlawful, because not so stated on the record, becaase it did not appear that it was iu terror of the people, and that it was not proved in evidence to have any teodeucy of that nature. Rut it la not because people of nei-ve were not alarmed that it may therefore he pronounced not unlawful. If the numberof people was so great; if they had weapons in their bands; if they were alteaded by such banuers and insignia, as must na-fiirnlly produce terror;-if all this be proved in evidence, then tbe meeting at Stockport was unlawful. If ever there weie a tumultuous assembly, it is that tu which our attention has been attracted yesterday and this day. The Learned Cou n. set fur the Defendants made several allusions to the trial of Mr. Hunt at.iYork, and I dTd not alteiopt lo slop him. But whatever was done at York, the Juries of Chester have nothing whatever to do'with it. Tarn obliged lo the Learned Counsel for bis mention of the case of tbe King and Hunt, Olid I say, if that were a case fur conviction, the one befure us is ten times stronger. Hunt was taken fi-Offi tbe meeting at Manchester before be spbkr. Here, seditious words have been used; this meeting had const, derably more terror in it, and, in short, it has every one concomitant circumstance, with one exception, namely, that here seditiuus words were actually used. If, then, we are to call to mind what was done by others at that meeting, we find the case ten times stronger as to this. Hatvkins, and other learned auHiurilies, have been cited as ta the legality of one of the acts charged in tbe indictment; with that you have nothing lo do. There seems lo me no necessity for dividing tbe case, the facia of it are perfectly clear before you. With respect lo'lbe legality of the meet, ing, one may say it was assembled -under the specious pretext of petitioning for Parliamentary Reform. Parliamentary Reform! I check myself; for though many of these unhappy meetings were assembled under �och apparent motives, the mask was here completely tbroi^n off, and there was no man who beard'of the meeting of Ibe 38tb June, but must know that it had no more to do with petitioning. for Reform than it had with^nyotber.purpo^e that the imagination of man could suggest. ' In this case thedefendants stood together on the busting>-they were each participators io the whole of the proceedings, and if any thing unpleasant lo Sir C. Welseley had occurred, if l^e found he was not in good company, would not he have left them ? He gave his complete assent to whatever was saidJjy -Harrison; and if the laognnge used byUim was aedltiaiiw in ita nature, SirChas. Wolseleywas, in pointof law,ieqitally guilty with the person who uttered it. The meeting was also attended with flags-" Mr. Park here observed that there was no evidence of mure than one flag liaviug been used. Mr. Benyon proceeded-" Well, one flag ia as good ns one hundred. The inscriptions upon it sufficiently prove the objects of the meeting. Crowds attended from distant pUres, and even from different counties, armed with slicks and other offensive weapons. And then.rna it be gravely con-texdedi that such an -assembly were met together for the purpose only of obtaining. Parliamentiry Reform ?' It has been set up, as a justi^cation of this meeting, that every man has a right lo meet for the purpose of petitioning. It has even been said that people may proceed to such meetings with flags and other insignia, provided their object be |>etil�on. But, Gentlemen of the Jury, will you believe that this ig the way to obtain a Repeal of Ibe Cora Laws, if they be objectionable? Aud aa lo all the farrago of Annual Parliaments, Universal Suffrage, and Vote by Ballot, if any man or set of men, were gravely and quietly lo -petition far their adoption, I sKonld lament their fully, while,! pitied their judgments, and should' Ihink they meant nut a reform, but a-ramplele'uverthrbw-and revolution. . For,dependnpon-it, ifever theseiHitigs are granted, this lyill no lunger reinain a ba|�pywunlry,�itb: a mind and balanced constitution, but will become a wild and dangeroui republic. If, however^-there are- persbWa-who think tbattltese things,will proycof ftervice, I.should-find lio fault wiib tbeir quietly astembliiij; to procure them, but 1 do find fanit with those who'atteiid such'meetings on-I hop9, my Lord, you will keep tbe Lcarn-iM lo the truth. ifiirdH-" I with you. Gentlemen of tbe Jury, to take notlniig from rae. If I inadverleiitly sUlc any thing iiiconsiaient with my notes of llieeviileuce, it will be in the power of the;ir.Lordships and yourselves to correct il. It will bp, ho.weve^i^yuurreculjectiun.lliat Harrisondidnoladvise tbe prlitio(ti�ifae House III'Lords ur Coinmons. Then add to thai the bdrrfen. aird llie ' ten thousand walla,* ami ask yourselves if t-am wrong ii,stating,lhat It was~no moreameel-ing fdr tbepiirpoie of |ietilidn than any thing thai theiniagi. naliun of nfaartaa.'^ggest? Now we come to the seditious expressions^' ^t'^^ll got draw your aiteiiliou lo Ihem further than llnrt-^-Yuu recollect the expressious used by Sir C. Wolsriey, relative to the Bastiles; as well atf those of Harrison about Iris ignoraore, whether a man of a pig filleil rtie throne, aa well as the other expressiuna of .contempt of tbe Sovereign, and it will be for you, as men of edm-a-lion and as men of teuse,'to say whether these expressions wpr^ not seditious,and were n'nl used, as the language itself impoiis,^ for tbe purpose iif brtuging-the l^oyal authority iulo contempt.-.The secondrauut charts the defendanta^ ,t(riib,�, ngaqti-eoiiv^ ^Vulnerable either in law or In fact, but m^e out in many difft-rent ways by the evideiice; by what occorred before and at the mreliug, as well as by what was anticipated from the.contemplated meeting at Oldham to be held un a future day. If tbe witnesses ate to be> believed, I shall ilemuustrate a conspiracy. All this. Gentlemen, is to depend-must depend ou Ihe evidence you have heard, and not upon what learned men have said. Mr. Rent-ham, every one admits, is a clever maa, but he- might as well talk of what occurred in China, as of what was going on iu this Court. He. might certainly write i.r comment upon the nature of an indictment, but he could nut know the nature of Ihe facts tu be proved, aud nut knowing this, he was totally incompetent lo form a just oprnion uf the case. It was urged that Sir Charles Wolteiey coold not be made responsible fur what was said or done by any other persons at the ineeting. But let me ask you. Gentlemen, whether he might not, if he disapproved of what was said, liave retired ; and whether his remaining was not an approval of tbe observations used by Harrisan? I give Sir Charles Wolseley .credit fur wishing to preserve peace in the meeting; a regard for their own safety would have prevented them from meeting the constables face lo face. As to tl>e expressions relative to tbe Bastile in France, had Sir Charles gone no further than expressing his satisfaction at its destrnclio'n, I shudld not have oi>-jecled to it, but I object to bis instituting a comparison between that and any gaol in this country. At that time a man could be immured in prjsoi by a leiire de eaeket^ without any opportunity or means of inquiring into orvindi-cating himself from Ihe charge against him; but here it was not in the power even of the King lo commit a man to gaol wilboin leaving him his right of Habeat Corpus- of demanding his trial, or his immediate discbarge. Where, then, is there any similitude between either Ihe prisons or constitution of the two countries ? But I will tell yuu what was meant by the mention of Ihe Bistile. One of the first steps to Ihe French Revolution was the destruction of that establitbmeot. I may be deceived-I may be warpi d in my opinions, but I cannot help urgingj I cannot conceive but that he meant a similar step shuuld lake place 'here. Great as was Ihe evil of Harrison's language, it was ligbt iu ibe scale compared with that of Sir Charles Wolseley. Tbe language of Mr. Burke on Ihe French Revolalioo, was quoted to shew tbe innocence of Ibe expressions of Sir Charles Wolseley; but was there any sioilitude, anj resemjblance between lh$ occasions or Ihe . jijk w^d^^^lJiflfereiit eitpfe�iuii�T�r��; n�ed|!~, ikn is'acconnfable for bis words, aiid if the words of Sir C. Wolseley can bear au innocent interpretation, let the defendants have all tbe advantage of it in a criminal prosecution, i tbink them highly criminal. The evidence on Ihe part of Ihe prosecution has been corrubo-rated by that for Ihe defendants, and under nil the cir-eumslaiices of the case, 1 cannot but feel satisfied that we have dejnonstrated the meeting to have been unlawfully assembled, and that such seditious expressions were made use of as lo bear on tbe first count of the iadictmeol. With regard to Ibat fur conspiracy, I think we have satisfactorily proved it. We have given in evidence a letter of Sir C. Wolseley, where he complains of a letter to Harrison having been delayed ifi its progress. We'bave shewn Ihem to hare been together before Ihe meeting, to have been together on Ihe hustings-Sir C Wolseley, as chairman, taking a - leading part, assenling to all that was. said by Harrison; and we have given you beside a letter from jjar-rison to Bagnaly, who is confined in Chester Cattle, in which he details the numbers who attended, and the general cir. curoitances of the meeting. Could Sir C. Wolseley have come to that meeting, and be, called by arcUioalions lo Ihe Chair without a previous knowledge of what was to be done? But even though he had had no such knowledge, I say that at that meeting they conspired to bring the Government and Constitution of Ihe country into haired and contempt. This of itself, I allege, constitutes a conspiracy. Gentlemen, I need not labour the question further. 1 tbink it is as clearit case as ever was submitted lo a Jury. I beg pardon for detaining_yon so lung. I leave it wholly in your hands, knowing ynu will shew no favour to Ihe Government on the one side, or lo the Defendants on the other. -If you have any reasonable doubt on your minds, give the beurfit of it lo'lbe Defendants. Justice must he done; withuut any consideration as lo the parlies immediately iulerested; and I hop'e you will give such a verdict as will prove satisfactory lo the county of Chester, as well as lo your Own consciences and tbe kingdom at large." The Chief Jijsticb (Mr. Warren), in Kcapilulaling the evidence to the J ury, said, that any meeling or great number of people assembled together, armed iu a warlike man'-ner, was illegal, fur no oue could foresee what might be tbe effect of such assemblies. This was laid down by Hawkins, and with it be concurred. In reading Ibe.evidence of Win-terbolbam, bis Lordship said it would be useless; it would be an idle waste uf time to say Ibat Harrison's expres-uont were not seditious. Tbeir natural import was of that character. It xiia forcibly said by the Attorney. General, commenting on the use of the word Bastile by Sir-Charles Wolseley, that there were no Bastiles in England. And coming from such a man as Sir Charles Wolteiey, it would be for Ihe Jury to decide what conslructiun shuuld be put on them. Tlie Jury would tee there was an evident allusion to there being some prison in England, where men were treated as if io a Baslile. And taking all bis words, it was contended 'they were not seditious; but if they considered the effect such words aa his must have In'il upon an assembly of 5,000 people, hov could they, even iu tbe largest charity, be otiierwise estimated than as seditious ? They bad only .a part of tbe speech spukeii offered in Ihe evidence uf Buwerman, and if there were any thing else said, some oiie un the part of the Defendants would certainly have bten produced. Allhuii'irh Sir Charles Wolseley did not himself put on the cap uf liberty ou tbe flag; he yet suffered it to be done; he assented to il, and doing so was answerable fur any criminality attached to such an act. It would be absurd to suppose tliat Sir Charles Wolseley, a man of fortune, ranki aud family,' would have mounted a scaffuld by some accident. It would ; be trifling with tbe moat ordinary understanding to think he ' there met Harritoii and. Fittop, without some previous un-; derstaiiding that be should have done so. ; Hfirriton heresaiil, it was not given in evidence that any . previous tne^tlnfr had takea place between bim aud Sir Charlta Wolseley. CuKP Justick-He would leave it to tbe^Idry to see irhat Sir Charles Wolseley meanti by the '� fc-reai strogile-" i With whom wa^ it io be? With tyranny and corrupMun; - ' ----the lyranis' "�� � ^ - lion iif R.f .rm ? If for Reform, they suhstitnle rMrvK and revolution; tlieii lliry wonld come mi>re nearly tu the real of the meaning of the words. In bis vi-" that was the-only meaning that could lie put 0|iearf-d, sanctifi"! by B-isuh- , ;t man who was noiv imprisoned for his crime; it was ci n>e-cialed to the cause uf liberty by Juhnsou, also iinpritt.ned; and it w;i� to becuniegrealer in tlieirauiials than the gli rioiis plain of Waterloo. Couple this with the coolemplnoiis derision which Harrison expressed towards thcptrsou of a Srtvereiijii lo be rrsperted by every gouil and loyal �mI ject. Mr. II.(ttni�ON-.My Lord; the witness first raid l--ughH-' ship ; but tMere rertainly appeared to me tu be ibis d'rfiy all parlies. Harrison said he did not kiiow wliat sedition meant, but bis words were evideully seditiuus. Sir Charles Wulsehy heard all Ibis- Sir C WoLBELEY-No, my Lord, 1 did not hear thi�, 1 was nut there. Chief Justice-Y�� are right; Gentlemen, Sir C. WiiI.elry was nut there when Harrison said it was almoi-t a duly lu resi>t the GinrerninVul of the cuiinliy, taut -S r Charles put the RisoluliuMS lo the meeting, our of wbii-ii said Ibat Lord Stdmoolh was guilty of high lreason ; unullier was, that a general meeting of dilrgal-s should take place at Oldham, lo consider ilie hr-tt ineaus uf obtaining their rights ; nnulher wa.s, tu make a coiled ion for tbe purpose uf defraying iheexiK-nHes of a profe-. cntiun against his Majesty's .Ministers, ami all this lu an .as. seinbly of 5,000 pt'ople, mauy of them armed with stirk-, which lliey ln-.indislied iu approbation of lh>ni. lie would leave it lu Ihe Jury to deride Ibe meaning of ilr Um- rnco"-rageinent, for the protection of those who might tn3|||c in similar pursuits, or be pruspcuteil fur their t*'ditioii. The nm-ment Ihe people heard Ihe soldiers were coming ih>-y hi id up their sticks, wbic^ shewed the use fur which Ihi-y bruuuhc them. They knocked down a police ufiicer in proof of winr they would have dune, and could that be a plie first qu s. lion tbey wonld have to try; aud secondly, if any sedii.ou) Rpeeclirs had been uttered, and uttered by the det'endanu.- Mr. Harrison, iu his ih-feocr,cuatmented ou whai he cail d an improper speech uf the Learned Judge (.Marshall), but which he (the C;hirf Justice) cuutidrred as veiy proper, a:id made quotations from Jeremy Beutliam, HJiich he callm" a helpfrum Heaven. Bentbam, doubtless, was a clever ip-ax, but it was lamentable to see so silly a bouk cuiue from su able a man. It was unpleasant lo see a man like Sir C. Wulse. ley-a man of fortune, family, and private virtue-it was lamentable In see such a man as Ihe cumpauiun of Harrison; but all that should nut prejudice the conri-e uf Justice. If they believed the evidence, Ihey were bound lo convict the Defendants, and nut let llie geuerusily �f tbe heart and tbe feelings of Ihe mind have auy infliieiir� upon their deliben^tion. The second count in the indiet. ment charged the Defendants' with cunspiiacy. It was urged that previous communication wa^ necessary lo be established before that charge could be made out; but acoii-spirary sufiicient to aupportthe iudiclmeut wa.1 made out iii this case; from Ibe whole tenor of the proceedings. Sir Charles was the man who t*i>k the leading pan, and rxciled tbe people to tumult and the uveriliruw uf ihe Govem-meut. Was the coaletcence of tbe actions and opinions uf Ihe Defendants a matter of iftere accident ? or will ii not ap-piar lUey acted in concert, and, therefore, conspired to �ffn t the must dangerous objects ? lu bis view the second i uuut of the indictment was sufficiently supported. The evi>Kuut'l(rs_ did not hear certain words, it inigbt su happtn Iirrbrm ftom tliefplace iu which they were situated, ur I'rum the lapse uf uieniory; but tbe use uf seditious expressious was positively sworn to by two witnesses for the Crown. Tliey w> re nuw called upon, firit, to consider if the meeting were an unlawful assembly, and then, if seditiuus sperchrs weie utteied lo excile contempt, lu that rase .Ihe Jury should find a verdict of guilty against both the defendants. And if lliey . concerted a scheme, and used seditiuus rx| ressiuns after, titey should also find them guilly. Gentlemeu, yuu will consider of your verdict. During the progress of llie I.earne� was allowed lo leave the Conit in order tu prv,cttre. bis, ihe Atlbrney-General, iiitinialing fo hiiu, that he haj "iio djnbi of hit speedy return. Wm. Proelor was pnt lo the Bar, and charRed villi fnrsing l,lie poippte oftvatlii.g lyrapis? iViiy, the rulers of the ianil. i a s.tfkinpon some priiitenr^ of peace or [ the duly. To Ibis be plcadetl Gij/�u, and waa scalcuced lo it, �! have Ibey anypoBslble biaWtfg on t"b.t qiivs- '